
Artifacts of R Buckminster Fuller
Volume Three. The Geodesic Revolution, Part 1, 1947--1959
James Ward (Editor)
Garland Publishing, Inc. | New York and London
ISBN:
ISBN-10: 0-8240-5084-3
Updated: 2024-07-14 19:20
Copyright © 1985
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher.
ENCODED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Contents
■.ea
SB®
BO'S®
Volume Three
IftlHiitfSl
--- ’ \1 ’
Sas
E-bbts/X® ^sirxrTr.
t u*«p'■‘T.,,v,‘.'i'til'; ■* •; **• 's'’K
rir; r?ri.' yx: :*ra
ipGietfiKel
,.
s-’-liiltp-tsS'tsSi ■.At,Ac.>iKrbli!.::K^u
r2ji£;r5s.?£ti\cJeJJjicir‘£2f/52
•7 z
7iMtl,.ii.l.:i^:Li!i.t*ii. ti’iTjO'/r ?U& •. .7,7 ■^x:i:;7;...
THE ARTIFACTS OF
R. BUCKMINSTER FULLER
A Comprehensive Collection of His Designs and Drawings in Four Volumes
Edited with descriptions by James Ward
A Garland Series
Volume One. The Dymaxion Experiment, 1926--1943
Volume Two. Dymaxion Deployment, 1927--1946
Volume Three. The Geodesic Revolution, Part 1, 1947--1959
Volume Four. The Geodesic Revolution, Part 2, 1960--1983
THE ARTIFACTS OF
R. BUCKMINSTER FULLER
Volume Three: The Geodesic Revolution
Part 1, 1947--1959
Edited with descriptions by James Ward
Garland Publishing, Inc.
New York and London 1985
ABOUT THE EDITOR
James Ward is presently a visiting professor at Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut. He studied engineering as an undergraduate and received his Ph.D. in the history of art from the Institute of Fine Arts of New York University. His dissertation was on Le Corbusier’s villa, Les Terrasses.
He has published articles on early modern architecture in Europe and has compiled a directory of New York architects before World War II.
Copyright © 1984 by the Estate of R. Buckminster Fuller
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Fuller, R. Buckminster (Richard Buckminster), 1895-
The artifacts of R. Buckminster Fuller.
Includes bibliographies.
Contents: v. 1. The Dymaxion experiment, 1926-1943--- v. 2. Dymaxion deployment, 1927---1946 --- v. 3. The geodesic revolution, part 1, 1947---1959 --- [etc.]
1. Engineering design---Collected works. 2. Fuller, R. Buckminster (Richard Buckminster), 1895--- ---
collected works. I. Ward. James. II. Title. TA174.F86 1984 620'.00425 84-21039
ISBN 0-8240-5084-3 (v. 3: alk paper)
Book design by Jonathan Billing
The volumes in this series have been printed on acid-free 250-year-life paper.
Printed in the United States of America
Maquettes for Early Geodesic Domes 1
Preparatory Studies for the Geodesic Dome:
The Icosahedron’s Thirty-one Great Circles, 1947 5
Great Circle Mapping Device Booklet, Late 1940s 11
Dymaxion Geodesic Structures: Twenty-five and Thirty-one Great Circles, 1949 20
Plastic Model of a Pan-Type Geodesic Structure, Thirty-one Great Circles 24
Geodesic Structures: ‘‘Noah’s Ark II,’’ 1950 31
Miscellaneous Geodesic Structures, 1950
Miscellaneous Geodesic Structures, 1951
90 Percent Automatic Cotton Mill, School of Design, North Carolina State College, 1951
Skybreaks, 1951 76
Proposed Sixty-four-Foot Diameter Skybreak for Aspen, Colorado, Skybreak Corporation of Carolina, 1951 77
Sixteen-Frequency Geodespherical Skybreak: Icosahedronal Adaptation, 1951 78
Proposal: A Geodesic Hangar, 1951 80
Eighty-Foot Skybreak (Maquette), Exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art, 1952 82
Geodesic Skybreaks, Drawn by J. Rauma at M.I.T., 1952 83
Twenty-Foot Globe of Wooden Slats, Cornell University, 1952 86
Vortexial Vertexes, Fuller Houses, Inc., 1952
Sixteen-Frequency Chord Factors, 1952 95
Spherical Truss for the Ford Motor Company Courtesy Building, 1952--1953 96
Experimental Greenhouse, School of Design, North Carolina State College, 1953 152
Dome Project, University of Minnesota, School of Architecture, Winter---Spring Quarter, 1953 159
Geodesic Dome, University of Oregon, School of Architecture and Allied Arts, 1953 169
Octahedron-Tetrahedron Truss, 1953 176
Proposal for a Service Garage, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Hyannis, Massachusetts, 1953 177
Geodesic Radome for Project Lincoln, M.I.T., 1953 179
Discontinuous Compression Sphere, School of Architecture, Princeton University, 1953
Radomes, 1954 184
Fifty-Foot Magnesium Geodesic Hangar for the U.S. Marine Corps, 1954 186
Tenting for the Fifty-Foot Magnesium Hangar for the U.S. Marine Corps, 1954 199
Geodesic Dome Patent, 6/29/54 200
Geodesic Dome, Set of Four Studies, 1954
‘‘Skyeye’’ Radio Telescope, Designed with Charles Eames, 1954 206
Fifty-five-Foot Geodesic Dome Hangar, U.S. Marine Corps, 1954--1955 208
Radomes, 1954--1956 209
Thirty-one-Foot Radome on the Hex-Pent Pattern (Lincoln), 1954 213
Diamond B Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome, 1954 216
Hex A Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Fuller Radome, 1954 217
Spider A Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome, 1954 219
Radome Door Handle, 1954 220
Twenty-one-Foot Fuller Radome on the Hex-Pent Pattern (Lincoln), 1954 221
Fuller Radomes (General): Flanges and Panels, 1954 223
Fuller Radomes (General): Warehouse Preliminary 112-Foot Diameter, 1954
TRIC Structural System, 1954 234
Dome Units for Geodesics (Paperboard), Mid 1950s 237
Triennale, Milan, Exposition Domes, 1954: Eight-Frequency Fiberboard Plastic Geodesic Structure, Thirty-six-Foot Diameter; Sixteen-Frequency Fiberboard Plastic Geodesic Structure, Seventy-two- Foot Diameter 239
Fastener Cam for Radomes, 1955 241
117-Foot Geodesic Dome, Six-Plane
Maintenance Hangar, 1955 242
Fifty-five-Foot Geodesic Hangar, 1955 275
Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome, 1955
Fastener Pin A, 1955 289
Forty-Foot Paperboard Dome, 1955 290
Door Handle Assembly for a Radome,
1955 299
U.S. Marine Corps---F.F. 42V2 S. Preliminary, 1955 300
Thirty-two-Foot-Diameter Rigid Radome, 1955 301
Homestyle Center Foundation, Geodesic Dome House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1955 304
Final Version of the Radome (Fifty-Foot Diameter): Flange and Vertex Details, 1955 306
Homestyle Center Foundation, Geodesic Exhibition House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1956 335
U.S. Air Force, Rome Air Development Center, Rome, New York, 1955 338
Swimming Pool Designs, 1955 & 1956 355
Geodesic Dome Greenhouse, 1956 357
Paperboard Dome, 1956 358
Geodesic Dome: Outdoor Circle Theater, San Mateo County, California, 1956 362
Plydome Studies, 1956 363
100-Foot Geodesic Trade Fair Dome (Pictures), 1956 370
Ten-Foot-Diameter Sphere to Stand in the 100-Foot Geodesic Dome at the Bangkok Trade Fair, Designed and Executed by Duncan Stuart, 1956 373
Ball Park Intended for the Yomiuri Giants, Tokyo, 1956 375
Geodesic Office Building for the Savogran Company, Norwood, Massachusetts, 1957 379
Union Tank Car Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Dome and Exedra, 1957 380
Twenty-nine-Foot-Diameter Plydome, 1957 386
Ski Lodge Design No. 2, Wurster-Bernardi & Emmons, Architects, 1957 390
Fifty-five-Foot and Thirty-six-Foot Diameter Geodesic Frame and Sheet Domes, 1957 392
Typical Raft System for Thirty-six-Foot Homasote, 1958 398
Octahedron Truss, 1959 399
Paperboard Dome Patent, 4/14/59 401
Plydome Patent, 9/22/59 403
Catenary Geodesic Tent Patent, 11/24/59 405
U.S. Air Force Academy Field House, 1959 407
Museum of Modern Art Octahedron-Tetrahedron Truss and Tensegrity Mast, 1959 410
Tensegrity Mast Installation at MOMA, 1959 413
Dome by Synergetics for the North American Aviation Company, Erected over the Buildings and Grounds of the National Headquarters of the American Society for Metals, Cleveland, Ohio, 1959 415
List of Figures
List of Tables
Chapter 1 Maquettes for Early Geodesic Domes
Buckminster Fuller geodesic spheres, 31 and 25 great circles.
Pentagon necklace structure, Black Mountain College, N.C., February 1949.
Pneumatic skin hex-pent involute, Black Mountain College, N.C., 1949.
Autonomous dome developed for U.S. Air Force, 1949.
Autonomous dome (maquette). Black Mountain College, N.C.
4 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
Autonomous dome (model), Black Mountain College, N.C.
Chapter 2 Preparatory Studies for the Geodesic Dome: The Icosahedron’s Thirty-one Great Circles 1947
Fuller’s invention of the geodesic dome is closely related to his invention of the Dymaxion World Map (ca. 1946). The studies of the thirty-one great circles that Fuller made and had copyrighted in 1947 initially were total abstractions; later he adapted them to his method of transcribing the surface of the earth to a flat surface. He diagrammed this method in a sketchbook entitled ‘‘Noah’s Ark II’’ (1950), now preserved in the Fuller archive. Further proof of the interrelation between the Fuller geodesic domes and his map, which he began in 1943, is the wood slat globe that he had built at Cornell University in 1952 with metal appliques that represent the land masses of the earth.
6 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1 7
Tic SWeitlE C-^rt SC soae/y/ocp zh-zo
30 Sp*f££i4xc- Stiimrs
/i SZ4.£S-
0/ j-cva t/pcj or
,y
( -
.7-■-
51 20
7^
/<£frcYS CIF
C£Ur«4C
rrr«i0M< -nr
3/ Ci&t-e -
V>UtCV \p^4-<'tXC(L
TT«A4/£I>'V
^.OCuTP ArV?C
D'jV SfflA'■» V
feg


THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1 9
«* 4*


5 4' 10
Chapter 3 Great Circle Mapping Device Booklet Late 1940s
12 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1


FIG. <o
fig.t
fig.a. a)
d.
ONE SPHERICAL EQUIANGULAR. OF THE rcoSAMKDfffirCE 20.
VERTEX OF MAIN SURFACE AMGL^ TXT








ONE SPHERICAL EQUIANGULAR. A
OF THE OCTAHEDRON'S 8
VEJETtX OF MAIN SURFACE. ANGLE ‘‘To0
°NE SPERICAL EQUIANGULAR A
Of THE TETRAHEDRON’S 4
VERTEX OF MAIN SUETfccE. ANGLE |ZO°.


![]()

t=»G. <\
65* 2 fa
BASIC DATA ON 15 GREAT circle triangles.
f.) picture op milk drop
I J SPLAGM /D’ARCY THOMPSON\ IDEWTlCAL? TO PHOTOGtAPH OP BdEOtE COlAP^E.
31*43' • II4I8O" « HAkf BASE 20*54* 20* - 7 524,0‘‘ 37*22'40‘‘ - 13454,0‘‘
EACH DIVIDEND BY 20 WHICH IS HloHEST COMMON DIVIDER. EQUAL RESPECTIVELY, TO: I* 35'04‘‘ 1* 02! 45‘‘ 1‘‘ 52' OB"


■ ' FIG-IO
MODULE OF
20 Equi AMG.
OF EDGE. OF
Mo R X - TOTAL LENGTH .
STRUCTURAL ESTIMATING SCHEME
UNIQUE TO THREE-WAY- &RAATCIRCLE GRID ON UNIFORM BOUNDARY ICOSAHEDRON'S MAJOR
THE INTERVALS UNIFORM BOUNDARY SCALE OF SPHERICAL EQUISIDE-AND-AN&LE.- - LATERAL-ARG TRIANGLES.
THE NUMBER OF WHICH UNIFORM INTERVALS ALONG ONE EDGE OF ONE TRIANGLE. OF THE TEN TRIANGLES COMPOSING ONE. HEMISPHERE OF THE ICOSASPEEE 15 KEY NUMBER . XN FORMULA FOR CALCULATING LENGTH OF RIBS OF AN ICOSA-GEODESIC STRUCTURE.
THE NUMBER OF EDGE INTERVALS GOVERNS THE SIZE OF INTERSTICES AMD SPAM TXX. ANY SIZE OF HEMISPHERE, STATED IN RADIUS OF BASE, AMD THE NUMBER OF INTERVALS PER ONE EDGE OF ONE ICOSA - EQQLLATERAL'S MAJOR SPHERICAL TRIANGLE EQUALS 'X* . PAPIU6 OF HEMISPHERE EQUALS ‘R’.
FORMULA FOR LENGTH OF ALL Bi BS, OF ALL SPAMS TOTALS >
ESTIMATING FORMULA
(ACTUAL FORMULA ---■ I5.70BRX * fed ee«0k}
FOR INSTANCE •--- larnaut. of intervals -a Aun eaoivs>30' fob a'aixty v oarer" with »D41 ihtakvau of 4-. 14-' and h»ihum SFAN OF 6.6T' wt HXVl ■ •
Ife RX • TOTAL LENGTH » lfc« 8*50 »s«4O Tt.
PLAN VIEW OF ICOSAHEDRON VERTEX , THE S OF ITS TRIANGLES AEOUN OWE VERTEX (AN TCOSACAP) REPRESENTING SURFACE AREA EQUAL ID AREA OF CNE GREAT CIRCLE OF ITS SPHERE . THE DIAMETER DF ICOSACAP EQUALS 85%, APRROX. OF DIAMETER OF ITS SPHERE.
ONE COMPLETE "ICOSAHEDRON A," 20 f>Efc SPHERE IS SHOWN AT (A) ONE COMPLETE "DIAMOND" OF 30 FEE SPHERE SHOW AT(t} DIAMOND AT(B) COMPRISES BASIC STRUCTURAL ELEMENT FOR. 3-WAY GRlPDlNfe ANp BANDAGES 2 ICOSA A$ TOGETHER .
UoR42OHtAL ARox.p OFOME <SREAT CIRCLE .
FACTORSSTRESS CALCULATIONS Op STKUCWKE fQK
U&VU VogK CITY
Wind load : ---
20 - 50* 4tyscj.fr ^OMLy- i_| ODOR. 4©'
p«AO LOAD PLUG •
Top FLOOt 66’%
N«XT • - 5% - So^o
AND So 610°/
DOWN UNTl'l--- ’’ Z°
FOR THE KOOP WE CAM TIG LIFE AT AREA PF I GREAT CIRCLE TIMES Bl » . N.r.G. Live LOAD » ft* R5
estimate ■ ---
451 DOME «
I6oo»5| » ^,400# live load
«-C)OO°*3 *®tons£ deadload » 2 tons' DIAMCyEUQ
TOTAL LOAD
AS* DOME
44' DOME
14-1-512 I5HO.4-
21 TONS -
c-iecuN-FEReucE -
AREA 7
150.250 IFlO. S’
![]()
![]()
![]()
FOR SUPER. 14V MCA Mfc WITH APPROX. DOUBLE THAT LIFT / GQ . FC. OF FLOOR AREA
" 1000 * OLc.iRCUNf-EfcB.HCE_.
UUMETtR LENGTHS STATED IS FEET OF MAXIMUM SPAN OF ANY RIB. IN A
GEODESIC HHUSPHERE STRUCTURE
Edge intervals or and area of naxinun span, ffir nuabers of intervals respective' to structure diaa. |
Hunter of Intervals adfa of iooaabadron triangle. ( see *X* factor ). |
Hla».Ft. 20 aaudaua ?pan Ft. |
BLan .Ft. 60 Maxinun span Ft. |
Dlaa.Ft. 100 tnAiHnnm span Ft. |
Dian. Ft. 600 marl taui span Ft. |
Dian. Ft. 500 imxIjuid span Ft. |
Dian«Ft. 1000 maxiinuD span Ft. |
Dianeter for - 1 Mile. |
• |
||||||||
0 5' 00* |
720 |
.015 |
4 |
|||||
0 15' ; 00* |
500 |
.057 |
10 |
|||||
0 so' ; 00* |
120 |
.08 |
4 |
|||||
1 OS' • 26* |
60 |
.18 |
.54 |
.9 |
2.7 |
4.5 |
9 |
|
1 24* * 86" |
' 45 |
.24 |
.72 |
1.2 |
8.8 |
6 |
12 |
|
3 57' ; 52* |
16 |
.69 |
2.07 |
8.5 |
ID. 4 |
|||
5 17' ; 10* |
tt |
.92 |
2.76 |
4.6 |
18.8 |
|||
7 55' • 45* |
8 |
1.58 |
4.14 |
6.9 |
||||
7 55' 45*) 9 22’ •_ 00* |
||||||||
1.65 |
4.89 |
8.15 |
• |
|||||
for 7 55« 45") 10 51« 00- |
||||||||
1.89 |
5.87 |
9.45 |
||||||
FIG- |5 £cout.)
1 LONGEST FACTOR Of LENGTH TOR ANY EDGE INTERVAL IS 4/i ' LENGTH OF EDGE INTERVAL / AS IN CUAET IO°51'3 LONGEST
-* FOR. 1° 55’ 45" INTERVAL).
Calculation tor. structure one mile in diameter and of
4 |ODT DIMENSION FDR ITS MAUI MUM PART.
USING FORMULA •. [ iGRX « TbFAL LEKjGTHJ ■ we hArUE. i
720 « 2G4O « 16 - 30,412,800 FeeT Of Ribs USlNfe M ALUMINUM TUBE. 2* Pl AM. =
- . 0G6-
0 <ao | - | 3, cnro , trro . oo
WE hAUE : ---
2* x .065 a . 5 x ZtOiCrro, <m> -• 15, rrt>,m Up = 7.500 Tons o|- AL.
CfalUNFEIRENCE - 71 t>
- 3*14 » 5200
- Apf>. IfaOOO F't.
- 4 fT. IWtfcRUAl OF tube.
= 4000 TUBES (*> .066 <7 ■ 455
« 2000 a^.i'w OF AL.
AT BASE .
2doo (a) 4o-<nrt> LESS-H
• &oicrtrQ>trtrD LBS
DEAD WEIGHT OF STRUCTURE
15,crtr6, friro
GROUPZ dlMU-6 6
G<®up 1
Bluc • a @
3 O’* |
1 o* |
lo* |
•ZO* |
3 a* |
|
51
GROUPS Rep - 3 @
groups qeey. 3 ©
GROUP 4
GROUPG
2C* H* io‘ |
.e’l’io |
^•xr' xo’ |
I-7 41JO* |
• <l* tf’2/ |
i5’-n :a* |
k’xi’ a«’ |
0*1 »->' |
Z7*i +‘za" |
|
l| •• |
1?‘An |
Z |
10 |
51 |
♦7 |
S4 *V> |
&S '.I |
7F4/.^ |
|
H
H
■gUuT I <rtf 4-
DYM AXIOM GEODESIC -STRUCTURED 2. 5 @ FAT. APPLIED FOR
COPY WEIGHT.' FULLER RfSEAACH RXJUPATieM H49.





p X> £ B BE o P e g- e>
G0DOP 1 5^) |
u*ir |
tV<7’ |
le'tf+f |
W’h’zO |
ZiTWZO- |
u,«i'4a |
irn‘ |
mr |
10*4 f ffi |
Z6*54‘2O |
20*5420* |
|
K'%3 |
zz *’«& |
?♦*%> |
44-x. |
K"4, |
||||||||
GROUP 2
5 <3
GROUP 5
5®
CODE |
ANGLE |
AEC |
CHORD |
G^ueestou |
||
A |
2i*l5‘O*' |
0.3113 |
0.JS57 |
Wit 514 |
TT" |
|
B |
16' 54‘ ZO* |
o»45'kffi |
0.342 s |
1443554fr |
'■1J |
|
„ c |
t«* |
O.» 124 |
L 4 ll 504<» |
IEU |
||
D |
u*n* |
otj Ifni |
O.2H3 |
5 .1004 43d |
IEFI |
|
E |
IO* 4a’ 40* |
O.ltt 341 |
0-1115 |
4.1441410 |
||
h. |
7*45* |
.nn |
.13 52 |
2.1711144 |
£TJ |
|
A |
C7*1«"NT |
---1 |
||||
DYMAtflON SjEODESlC STRUCTURE 3| @
PAT APPLIEP
copyright:
2- ’’4
FULLER KE5CAPCH FOOUPATIOM H4<T
to 'I***. )
ion ojj union niMiaam .»«< nr mi A- lion X&UMJXS, IXPIXU* BUU3
I. Uf ilM 9t tka «14Ui part '<m1> lb» prtdoct af Ua «M1m« af Ua appMlla parta.
Mucni nuKin.
Seodcsic pata
|
|||
FORMULA |
MUMOew. |
LOdi. |
|
Aaea or O |
IM’ ’- |
3. «114 r' |
.4 47 lit t |
1/-5 4 4* |
1.11 s-04 -IO » t^4» |
||
Cut CaMFCxeA^ |
iTr |
C-’fW r |
Ilf 114 -. r |
or O |
3. *4 I L d |
.41H54 +6,4 |
|
AOca OF |
I2 C444 p - |
LOT? -ZI4 4-f^ »-• |
|
CD |
Td' |
I-J5 IL d* |
.41 7/5-4- </* |
VOLUME Of |
4.h»7 p |
.£2201 -FA,*-' |
|
© |
ftp |
.5234 d* |
9.7 Hao ho 4/^’ |
Artex of |
fi.lyjz >.* |
. 7* !»♦ ♦ A, rx |
|
t£> |
7T2K |
I. <5-10 5 |
. 124 |
OOLUMC OF |
ULt* 3 |
2.05¥V h' |
. 31104 |
4^1 |
.10 .< 4» |
9.11717 |
|
Atze Al |
OF TRI A |
u c,t-es |
COPC |
Factor. |
U O A. |
1 |
.021 11 IT |
t . H 444(27 - IO |
z |
e 34 i tir |
t iTITATr-10 |
a |
■ 0 L 4 1 TO |
1. VI 0050 • lO |
4 |
■Ol 2 »5FO |
f. loioio -IA |
TOTAL 0.16472. - ZTXa f AV'Co P.r
|
||


![]()
![]()


![]()
![]()
--- ftp woiC*. Abo iPTFtiorx com? ir mcmtaa-'/
7 X’s cewtrAl Zi - (QueruoM 6ahea factor.*) Hanaa. _U.tKliZ.E5 -10° M* SrtU 2-feAU 70* B-z'
J |
||||||||
a |
1 <n |
1 |
i d |
0 |
4 < X |
d |
||
«n |
a |
|||||||
• |
||||||||
xff J p 2 |
£ o (2 IL |
3 o F £ |
< * 1 X |
*O y cr |
(f V e X 0 2 |
•e cr |
||
o |
□ |
|||||||
In |
1 |
I |
||||||
* |
* |
bo |
||||||
X |
r |
k |
•4 |
|||||
w |
T <n |
in U» |
fro tr
|
<H |
||||
a- |
o |
|||||||
fl |
in |
» |
||||||
s |
||||||||
J |
Q 1 |
© |
||||||
g |
||||||||
< |
1 |
i |
||||||
I- |
a < |
N |
--- |
0
|
(T |
£a |
||
J |
3 |
« |
||||||
cJ |
x> |
in |
||||||
e |
b |
to
|
U» |
o |
||||
D |
Do |
fr° |
fO
|
tO |
||||
2 |
(A |
|||||||
2 |
~2 < |
i ■ I |
||||||
Z2 |
▼ JT |
T |
•3
|
2 a |
||||
d +
* <F £ |
1 s |
4 |
r |
r |
||||
d <■ 1 |
< JT |
<r |
t |
4*= |
||||
7 » |
tl |
n |
||||||
CP |
2 S |
S|z |
3d *2
|
£ |
||||
xr |
< |
1 |
||||||
5 |
||||||||
: 1 i ‘
|
||||||||
CHORD TO TAMfttA/rZ |
ii’ n' io" |
Q "r- od o |
cr |
:O to to |
•© V cd *10 |
> bJ h % |
1 1 |
Left. (c.r.\ |
i.e-f <n‘i- it> |
•<~ IhJJbtz fa |
o 7 bo Ml to |
o I 00 o to r Cd cr |
i u i 3 |
||
CHORD factor |
c fr° to |
N io |
cr to |
tn r N |
* o*> |
rl to |
£ 1 < ---«--- |
s xj c |
01- LIZ 5-S'fe |
Q •*. 1 CM r * cr |
T. jt b/| - fo| |
o I U t* T |
> >• to 4 »- |
||
tl 51 * a Q * £ |
<ilt>V |
O’ y >» to |
3142 |
to •<• to M |
L&M’ | |
A In m Tr |
3 4 |
|
to 5 CM |
• ^r» I % r< |
v> |
r (* |
XQ *O |
U* »■ • |
|
CODE |
< |
» l-H- |
L> |
a |
u |
Ul |
-H- |
|
|
|
|
In r tr |
Q |
||||||||||||||||
|
u X o p |
ki 2 3 5 |
ti b>0 y |
<r 0 N |
© frx |
U ©• v3 © |
In rJ c* |
O In U U |
In \9 to •o N |
o Ip (x C* |
o s to to rn xf |
o cr * b b |
o r r |
o d o |
In tj o •s m |
q bo O \A |
q rd IP C o r |
6 xA * CM Cd |
Q cr kfi rd |
-j* 1J |
|
|
€ £ |
U) X D C 7> |
cJ r >0 |
fro Oa 2 xf- |
cO fro fro |
O CO |
CT'S- d- N N |
O to k» cn |
O in |
o Q to * to |
o * 0» |
© to «r ’O |
o d <r f |
q to to cr |
o d cr fr* © P» |
q to > O fro w •N |
o U tr N tP |
a V o r 0« (fl |
O 6 r* fro TT |
q fro to to rd to |
J lu |
|
*X ‘ |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
u> S Q A |
s cE < |
lr CM In |
In 0= r* \D |
u Co cr |
■? |
In H XT CM a- |
In ir» (ft N |
to o fro |
o r N tn |
x9 (ft 5 |
O U to M) to |
u> \i a |
q s <r |
o d tn fr* |
O to to o o |
o <r to |
to rP CM rd |
I? xO |
q fra O to |
to |
|
I |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
i |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
UJ u U/ $ |
s d < |
\n \5 O r |
r >A u c< |
in cn cr |
M- Im N |
In OQ cn |
to \s ri in |
g fl |
Q ’d to o- |
(M c<> o In <r |
q o" co |
0 tn r r< i* |
a V <r <n in |
o fi Ml |
o Q 0 (X |
q x> N d |
o T >»• (A N |
9 to to to fro N |
q 4 xt (« |
2 |
|
d s |
5 < |
r 4 r |
ND |
> cr * |
\ © |
CM \ cr |
a vS to r* |
fl g r H 1 |
to c« 0 0* |
fro to ro N |
4 N o« Cl |
tn »O if (0 |
to fro d fro CO |
to xi rj a (A |
1ft r- in |
r u to v!) |
P< 6° 0O o |
q b r |
<5 u> ---> 2 j
|
|
|
32 )£ (g)s TOTAL LBHTH |
cr rn in r |
fro © o |
0 \J b CM |
N O IT |
d- 0° to |
yS tr a 0 c« |
H i |
0 d in N |
fr? N |
o fp |
CJ N CO |
a c c* to pn |
0" \ P |
(4 cr o xt |
q N d ■* |
4 to to V |
M xt |
N r n o to |
z
|
|
|
(ii |
2 (U 1 |
N r c ■+ |
r- <r |
rt> 4 r£ M- N |
M- M- <r CM |
o; o XT C" |
<C fro C° |
1 •d Q * pH xtf |
o XT |
F7 rn in co in |
d * *> IP |
N > |C |
°7 fro |
* «T O to r |
m d cr r- r |
3 5 0" |
to u to 0° |
* d b CM |
to o- |
|
|
f p |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
uJ 3 g i |
N r |
N kS |
«’ (O u* fro |
fro S' J |
O to a- |
* v£ to rj |
ci rf * |
o Q G* |
fro fro |
i ©Q fro |
d Q N s CM |
o- r CM |
Z kJ to to CM |
ni r** to CM |
to to Q kI |
t« * ci »• N |
Ift Xt- N |
O XA to |
(O ar > |
|
|
V |
lU |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
U- |
q |
fO tn |
s |
frj CM O CM |
oa \fi (M |
4) © Cd |
6 tri |
rl to CP |
co |
vD to c ■d |
cn xf |
£ d |
to c iS |
ip |
o to in |
4* C vD |
h >r |
1J* MJ d |
|
|
|
M |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
co |
xt |
Lft in |
Kl N |
a- to |
o |
4 |
•H to |
m (M |
*1 |
In MJ |
\D to |
be |
*S* |
o |
□ |
|||||
|
II) |
V |
<n |
00 |
CM |
N |
r; |
|
tr , |
O |
to |
o |
tT |
tr |
Xj- |
< ft |
|||||
|
1A |
C** |
r3 |
ra |
xtf- |
to |
to |
d |
r* |
fra |
be |
co |
C‘‘ |
||||||||
|
f |
in |
(A |
|
o |
00 |
vJ |
to |
• rd |
r» |
to |
CM • to |
O to |
© |
b? |
> |
|||||
|
cr 2 U> J |
A |
fO |
P CM |
CM*' |
efi |
q |
4 |
to |
to |
d |
to |
O I f |
O’ |
Cd |
O . |
d r--- |
to |
o |
||
|
D H 0 |
0 |
•i P r* |
N rn |
N xS Tf |
*$• to |
ba to c» |
fra fA O r*C |
N N bo |
to 2 |
S rn |
<5 |
Ii |
zC to |
E (M |
£ rd |
Q q if |
Ml kJ |
M- xT kj to |
g C2 C) |
|
|
X U |
tf |
u> rj N |
cJ rn |
M) (« in ’d |
rd tn ID |
o fO |
to I? CM |
to MJ fr» |
H r- © |
©O |
'© o |
? |
H o r N |
©a s I*’ |
xfr to |
cn CM to |
? to |
M (A P |
<D rr |
|
|
< |
M 0° |
In O’ |
s 2- x± |
r- in |
2 r; © |
r |
<0 r U c>o |
M- q |
Ml Q M © |
Cd to |
m to CM |
to k» |
v» to |
rd s s> |
<D to to F |
* 0® |
* rd |
\r> |
||
|
d |
o to |
o |
V 4 r- |
a |
<o |
VO |
r |
ff* |
Cd |
v» |
o |
to o <r r |
Cd c |
•> r* |
IM to to |
sa M |
UJ Qi |
|||
|
c |
o |
f-4 |
r« |
X* |
x> |
'T |
to |
b |
O |
Aa |
xb |
‘jJ |
||||||||
|
S |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
---* |
- |
- |
- |
-i |
•4 |
|
|||
|
•g |
u |
© |
Kn £f |
Vi |
s |
O r< |
s CM |
to |
s |
s |
U r* f* |
U |
Q |
5 |
£ |
□ |
||||
|
< |
vn *<• |
2 |
o |
Vi |
Q XT -rr1- |
u d t--- |
u -r---1 |
i: -r1 |
’’I |
£ |
b tA |
a |
s ---*- |
o cr |
to |
3 TT- |
o U- -t!--- |
|||
Chapter 4 Dymaxion Geodesic Structures: Twenty-five and Thirty-one Great Circles 1949
Architecturally, the great circles represent the vector equilibrium and the icosahedron that became the chief models for Fuller’s structural designs. His purely geometric constructions had been presented as an analog of nature’s energy continuum. However, Fuller eventually developed a concrete means to translate the great circles (twenty-five and thirty-one) into architecture in 1949. These complex designs comprise two simple components: the strut and the hub (of which one finds eight distinct types). But despite the specificity of these designs, one gets no idea of how the struts were to be fastened to the hubs, nor the materials to be employed. These blueprints represent the structural transition between the intellectual geometry of the sphere and its concrete manifestation in the geodesic domes.
Chapter 5 Plastic Model of a Pan-Type Geodesic Structure, Thirty-one Great Circles
GEODESIC
RING ASSEMBLY
LOGAP 'H.V.
LA.-.VS ’ ‘*x'. •.-'.■at* e.
'■a |
-X-.^ |
|||
i® |
o o |
s><^ |
||
... |
9 |
f) = |
-2y-% |
|
--fz-n |
||||
fi |
V |
1^.9 |
a Oy --<s.--ifa |
|
■ . |
O |
|||
a, ■■ ...
■:■•<■ V-'S t^±©2
•'i &i)
ft
'-^=? s c© ea
s-%»ec«
9 0-
oj:p& co-op at oro Wof-6 6>®2©cc
qr<@ 70 o
ct«b
..
?E<r -E-
Q'
31* 63 -
37* _2- CO
ao*
y-
90'
-~
/o'. 3,a'
; . • ■ ■
‘ J
.-i
2 355
• •-
Chapter 6 Geodesic Structures: ‘‘Noah’s Ark II’’ 1950
The materialization of the great circles was achieved in Fuller’s sketchbook ‘‘Noah’s Ark II’’ which alludes to the teleological role he expected his applied geometry' eventually would play. However, even the figurative buoyancy connoted by this title would become literal in Fuller’s later schemes for floating cities. In this sketchbook are the first studies of the hardware and materials that would make the domes a palpable reality. Among these studies are such structural formulas as the three- way geodesic grid; the six-diamond structure; the three- way eight-space grid; the high-speed expanding, skinned, and trussed three-way geodesic structure; the zigzag assembly; and the ‘‘A’’ and ‘‘B’’ zigzag strips. These templates of 1950 would inform a host of projects over the next quarter century.
Wil* .
/4u< p/my '
’ a 6/a/ f- i »-r- nr
QWIP/ QZl^Ap)
flbT&Oo^ T&Z 2
4---GTM'tT/'.'hL---<2^5 £4 tprrp
c/t^T pPt/Tppr
LV&l't IT po&SKOV TTZ.\C> &
<r • ttt Ko m /7^<f£
[pklQlWT To ?6SIT/1/^
lf/pTllA^ T^n?4
d? T^^sr
ftT AU^ iTCTy
u>^uC£ zV^^/ T^TO T
/UTT l~Tuv^ APT.
&ML Cur, ^'T' <TT&rC&
O/T
A^U.0 Tk-L^S (jjK-tt'k-
‘ ^TT' PO^)uC.A-'QT3
N «f4?7*27p7/oTLs OT Im..
TU-^ CWTr
H£ t> COH574X/X5-
l&-^ uii-r-i&q
t?4>U'BLlg Ik/ klUE Ta -2^
u*r?
74L V'Sir?
falHii** iGTlL, i/£cranyT7£^^fj 'G^a
-Jji fiaGJ.&r« z: -J&±td? -‘‘ /I ^lU/Lf-
4 «2-^O PU4-/4F 4<-r, S4«»,t/*G C. IZ ^eRncrS .
PM-$ at ode i/£erFyT)_3
s ^J/C/rj Pc/PGTS
}/Jro c-
K^L- V!K( f- TToLTuT-JLt
AT y\Q IMUL\ TTSou^CT /AWE f
pT^ u Ui~rs (j-p- '/ft-' ojuiTA^/) S&ifi'/ct.
p"Wp f/A//^ WCC T/AP’S-p F&uZ
po( £CPC7l
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1 33
r^^X- T3
/^ &/1// ■$ ,6^£r
(To^ V '0dP^4' A
'A 3C2f


![]()


)
<2 Ng&Z ZA#W4/r<L/
4-V/y, VorU- T&7fa
A 6 4 /<T <jre<. /2 '32<<^ -/<<2^'‘^-j? 2
Offset ( </■£ 77^
ferjOTZ r
Z <P^^^-r <S//?G^5 ^^ce 4/^*>(S X/GO /A/ OGTX^ Sr.
'‘S&uo 4 /Gndj^'r /^ £ZZ73’ ’<j^-



34 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
fa ft Z ~7Ar£-LC^_ A'*/
A 5 6fA--rt(7 Aa/
$L>cJ4 TVlQT^ <- £<> WPc&X&S TO^sr
Ac
Fi_&^o(14-i.G y VP 7%l8o /N T&-& ^Qo
i-t>M>5 aft
A<RS- Wfa<HiS9
Pl= *=■ S’
- ^‘>'~i<'W*-s-<s l
JL f? ca^^JO !/&erzA:^ 1:9
■ ,4A/n g-ip<^ S.5 --- ^S>
nS-lciliOf CoX.T’-f-^^^’ ‘‘'
Miscellaneous
Geodesic Structures 1950
U---U-U------


Fuller research foundation






HIGH SPEED EXPANDING , SKINNED
IT is possible. to collapse CTtucTvjt«.j AND THB.N TD PULL EACH OPBN &r G«:en C ) tensions which Complete the
TWO "rRtRAWflDRON* TRUSS GRID . EACH DIAMOND MAY BB PVU.CO OPENED by ADJACENT DIAMOND |K1 OPPOSITION).
CAN FIRST RICr IT AS ICOSASRCT1ONS WHICH will contract alonc its Btxj.ni uni formly AS DIAMONDS ARB DRAWN. THUS IT WILL WORK FOR SPHERICAL TETRA
OR OCTA Ott I CoS A AC WHOLR SPHERE OR SECTION* OF fiPHBKE* /WHICH WOULD
BB AIS EM BLED AS CHDtD STRUCTURES).
IF NYLON) SKIN OF DIAMOND SHAPE 6HWN th) 4- steipl.
WITH XlPPEleS ** ARROUfUD EDGES AND FACTEWBP AT A 4 &■ > XT HAY THEN) Bits ZIPPED ON 4 EDGES TO ADJACENT DIAMOND AND to COMPLETE DOMK SKIN .
FULl.EE KESEAECH TDONOATIObJ
CoPYHaHT IRCO
patbntcd Canada U.S.A
Can rbverse tension compeesliOm T&THLCX MBMBGRS , SOTWAT RE."D DIAMOND is TENSION (■ BLUE
Line (- ) |ixmt> tension , And
GReCN ( ’) HOOK CftBLE TENSION).
THEN WITH 4 * TINKBt TOY* STRUTS. ANO TUBE - DALL - CABLE NBCKLACt, BY RD-UBASiNG GKEBN /* )
WHOLE STRUCTURE VUI LIT C.OLLAFA& .
I’
Smaller idbntical diamond may be strut down puspcnded dulow top diamond and THUS WHEN ASSEMBLED , MAKE WHOLE STRUCTURE A DOUBLE. *KIM ANO FULL.TRUSS structure which When CtR-e.cn / ) tdnsioNc are. hookg-d-im cannotcolat
compressions may be. TEL-UiCornp or Tosblr hinge Collapcmd TD enwreArr LINCTM of wu
![]()




![]()
![]()
![]()
PATTI NT£». ROUAKOUNP
PvOTS TV AMY
Assembly components and routine FOR PLASTIC FABRIC covered zig-zag TRUSS UNITS, (of metals , plastics or. fibrous board)
OF 3-WAY GRID UNIFORM EDGE (OEMreAKiNG) MODULE GEODESIC STRIXTURETTORMED ON SPHERICAL ICOSAHEDRON , COVERED BY U S A - and Canadian patents ano CopVRl&WEO I95TD BY r.bockminstee. fuller..
---1-1
4S THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
DIAMONDS
1
RED
----'tiki DIMENSION SttECM-OUT OF BASIC A> GEouPED Br DIAMONDS*--- omnsere) ZL . ib44o A
2 ORANGE
.IMAO ®
ojtwMfU kwb reT
tow (Hl okauak Ci)
• i‘1<* ® ■ nsi» (?)
muw (io otaNse
5
Yellow
4
GREEN
5
BLUE
VIOLET
KZO Cm)
• 'WO @
2MD RUD <u)
-'MIO @
RKg (M). --- F*t> CM) - OttWtvl ouwefwT
J‘‘°1©
OCAMGE reY CtEEFkl /ceA
ISW0 .11414
.14104. @ |
.n.24 (g) |
.niic© |
..sna Q |
.Hina @ |
|
J1L
■MAHOE CM).
g.KAuae AC.
KEO (K) GtTEN
•11124 g) bus no va.CT fr.1
FULLER RfcSEAECH FOUNDATION
COFTKIG^VBD 19 SO
WLTWHveo Canada --- U-S-A
VCr - . -rK/)
HJIIEO Rlsuncw rnilMOMTiOM
• IMIG @ .11444 © .Ifa544 @ &
gctbh An amn buje Cm)
-6a) - -yaWE le)w> c-KEH f l) t FmS Gkkkh cffo-i wbletZl)
•11141 © 11,14 @ •1541fe (J) -15414 © ■11124 @ (£
.ftmw <%)
jte«T Crt ...'teew/rt.
Blue ft) Blue to
Btue Cm) BUIE Imr~ Vloirr ftA) MOLEtYmT
• mu (gj .Iifio @
OriENfLLoT 'AoLEr/<-S
JflofcgLAJ- vnotET
.nrw <g) . iTOse
. isosa
■BUIE fg) VIOLET (M) VOLET (Ml VIOLET CL) VIOLET Ipl
- OrtKALL TKOSS LENGTH
|
OF 10 BASIC |
triangles - |
|
A |
B |
c |
D |
U&HT BLUE |
»RK BLUE |
BLACK |
Gear |
.I84RO |
.16802 |
.16706 |
14706 |
• 18342 |
.18410 |
. 17518 |
. 16706 |
. 101 IO |
• .17154 |
- 16802 |
. 17 124 |
.55742 |
.532«6 |
.51024 |
.30538 |
G |
H |
I |
|
BEIGE. |
wlanob |
||
.11424 |
.18516 |
.17762 |
• 17762 |
. 15776 |
. 17514 |
.17124 |
•17762 |
. 18316 |
. 16344 |
.15416 |
•17560 |
.32018 |
.52654 |
.51 102 |
.53084 |
•11141 @ BLUE Cl.)
E
WHITE
. ni2G . 15778 .15776 .48462
- SUMARY OF TRIANGULAR TRUSS DIMENSION TOR WHOLE SPEKE
.55742 .5528G . 51026’ .52654
120
Jo
. 17560
. 15058
.15056
.47476
3. I 5828
D .50556 E .48682 I
I .55064 (
J . 47474 I
1 . 44180
40
EACH PER SPHERE 4 * 120 - 720 A
EA£.M PER SPHERE. 4 « 40 - 240 A
Sum ■ --- 720 4 2AO&. SCO TSiMIGIM
IPA>NIQQg-TYPES OFTRIANCLRS OF WMjCH 4 [GKOUP A) RfiPEA .S5.ofe.ovr.V1e/ makA.
.*• 3.15826 x 2. ■ 4.51654 1.9A9SO
&IMaaaL^ U|>4otAL «uu* o|. A <- IS w» V.A-UB t --- 6-51 6 54
Mrw»«rlC---
PAl£N (E[) U-5.A- •'CANrtbrt-..
AHO Ca /■Ykic.mtgo I^Fa uy ft bJCKHmSTB'i FJUUS/i. ’
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

PRODUCTION STRIP PATTERNS OF *A* **» V ZIG-ZAG WHICH INTERACT TO COMPRISE A COMPLETE 5-WAT GR»O TRUSSED ALL TRIANGLE SPHERE. REquiKING WO OTHER FASTENINGS
FULLER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Corr<>*KTeo Hrs
rAieurtD Canada --- U-S A
ttra
AH g P.UB
lH tMIFMft Mqpuus , Qp a
ZO1\ CA>* rCM* A KESertivUA F=* G/fT/oN
OCTAHEDRON SUB-DIVISION OF 6 FREQUENCY


DATA IN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE
ANGLE |
ARC FACTOR
|
'cord factor!
(R.11 |
1 % ANGLE |
||||||
! io- si1 ir |
. 184421^
|
. IflTIO
|
Is’ 23’ 35’ |
. 04435
|
84’ 34’ 25* |
||||
j 10’ 36' 56* |
. 1851744
|
. IB440 |
• |
Is* 18’ is" |
.042+5
|
' 8+" 41’ 42* |
|||
j 10’ 31' 23’ |
. IS366I4
|
. 18342 |
5’ IS1 42* |
■ 04171
|
i 84* 44’ 18’ |
||||
10’ 30‘ 45’ |
. 1854777
|
. .18516 |
5’ 15’ 22* |
. 0^158
|
j |
84’ 44' 38* |
|||
IO’ 14’ 34’ |
. I8O224G |
. 17444 |
1 1 |
S’ 4’ 47* |
i .08447 |
84’’ 50' 13* |
|||
10" 17' 17* |
.1745604 |
• 17424 |
I 5° 8' 38* |
.08462
|
«+’ 51' 22* |
||||
10° II' 25* |
• 1778554 |
.17762 |
5° 5‘ 4 2* |
. .0888 1
|
84’ 54' 16 |
||||
10’ 04' 20* |
. 1757455 |
. 17560 |
1 |
i 5° 02' IO* |
.08780
|
S4- 5T 50* . |
|||
10’ 03’ OR" |
. 1754444 |
' - 17518 |
S’ 1' 34! |
. 08754 |
84’ 54' 26’ |
||||
4° 44' Zb’ |
. 171+542 |
’ .17126 |
4° 54' 43* |
j . 08563 |
85? 05’ 17’ |
||||
4" 38' 15* |
.1684564 |
. 16802 |
4‘‘ 44’ 37* |
. 08401 |
85’ 10* 25* |
||||
4’ 34’ 52* |
. I67Z2I4 |
.I67OG |
4° 47' Z6* |
.08353 |
65’ 12’ 34* |
||||
4’ 30 08* |
. 1658450 |
. 16 566 |
4-° 45' 04* |
.08285 |
S5* 14’ 56* |
||||
q» 22' 33" |
• 1656541 |
-16544 |
4° 41' 17* |
. O6I7Z |
85’ 18' 43* |
||||
4° 03' 08" |
. 1 574411 |
.15778 |
4’ 31' 34* |
. 07884 |
85’ 28’ 26* |
||||
6’ 50' 34" |
. 1543355 |
. 1541G |
j |
4* 25' 17’ ! |
.07708 |
83’ 34' 43* |
|||
8* 38' ICT |
.I5O72B6 |
. ISO58 |
4° 14' OS* j |
■ 07524 |
85’ 40' 55’ |
||||
7’ 55" 45*
|
. 1385401 |
• 15824 |
3* 57’ 52" I |
. 00*11 2 |
86° OZ' 08* |
||||
5° |0' 41* |
0405742 |
.04034 |
1° 55’ 20’
|
. 04-517 |
87’ 24’ 40’ |
||||
5’ OB' 47* |
.0848215 |
.084 78 |
2’ 34' 23* | |
. 0440*1 |
87’ 25' 37* |
||||
PIECES PER SET
ONE
TWO
TWO
FOUR
FULLER RESEARCH FOUNDATION.
TABLE OF CENTRAL ANGLES (arc) CORD AND CORD SEGMENT ( TRUSS OR TRUNCATED CENTRAL ANGLE (S OCELES ZS? OF THREE WAV GRID, UNIFORM EOTSa ' MODULE- EDGE , SPHERICAL EQUILATERAL ZX OF 8 SPACES ( ON (COS AHEDRAl)
COPYRIGHT 1450
R. BUCKMINSTER FULLER
EULER'S LAW ■ *•«---» . •« f*
SUMIVIPED AS FOLLOWS .
UNIT ONE (yellow GO tx
SO X 6 - 340
FULLER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DATA SEQ&ENCE •• of
■ STRUCTURAL
TS> OF 3-w'AT GRID
CFS IWTERUAL iccSAnEDLCU.
UNIQUE
e suCkhimSteE-WLIH
![]()
![]()
![]()

STRUCTURED WITHOUT ANY FASTENINGS OTHER THAN
Held $ DISCLOSED THE SUBlIhELY SIMPLE E)4tEH
BY WHICH DOMES AND SPHERE? MAY BE DEEf
STKUpOREb WITHOUT AMY T STEM INGS OTHEl? THAN Tl)E SELF A A A B b A
GRIPPING OF THE
£swwpt parts.
EACH OTHER *|jN SUCH A MANNER AS TC COINCIDE ONCE i^ONLY WHILE COMPLETING A 3- WAY GREAT CIRCLE. T* G RI D OF THE SPHERE ft ** 9 and each zig-zag is ^IHTERWfUi'PEP WITH THE OTHER BY THE METHOD
Ke OF PATTERNING THE STRIP IMMATERIAL .AS CONTINUOUS
i^ CMTOWHIG ALL
THE CUTTING AND pF'^ING LINES ’A^ ROTO PRINTED-
HERE IS DISCLOSED THE SUBLIMELY SIMPLE SYSTEM
BY WHICH DOMES AND SPHERES MAY BE DEEP TOSS
THE SELF
GRIPPING OFTHE
SITUCWEAL PARTS
s
ZIG-ZAG A" 'B'
CEOSS EACH C5TMEP
IN SUCH A MANNED AS ID COINCIDE ONCE ONLY WHILE COMPLETING A 5-WAY GEEAT CIPCLE GEID OFTHE SPHERE AND EACH ZIG-ZAG IS
INTEPWRAPPED WITH THE OBlEE BY THE METHOD OF PATTEEWING THE STElP MATERIAL AS CONTINUOUS Eollep strip ONTO WHICH ALL the CUTT1NG- AND FOLDING LINES AEE ROTD PRINTED
invewnsv M.R tuxuiMSTT«k Fou-EK
FULLE R EESEAECH FOUNDATION
Cofnrtl&HTED IA5O
PATENTED CAMAVA --- O-S-A ..
CP STRUCTURAL 'DIAMOND' (TWO SPHERICAL TETRAHEDRAE ,TRUSSED BETWEEN RADIUS CT 2 NAfcMTLOeS.)
&TYPES ■ O» <3> F**' SPHERE
O» . WHICH. ’•
£ TYPES., u«r«AT INSIDE. OUT «* n tvoh- or
• : JB^ATWS "of A*»*M»uy +■ Afplic»ti#h _•>.
■ r- 'TO SPHERICAL- STR.9CTUMU :
fcO 'wJcupF ARCH oeTHt. STfm - '
49C> ro» SVHKRA
LONG, wfoohau ASIN raUKMatlr OP BASIC SKHAOMD COMFUCTU MAMOHU K, A IRIK TCTMHBBUM
■Rirwt
• UNlRDKM ---"A TT ® ®
•UAVWIMCN (K *r
tcmiiHrxoU *m<
-i_ ® ‘ X
*vmwt«« aimaM Hen)
UR it muuu i* ***'<•«* chm*'»M.t** >.n«
UOCUKCT K9W< 19 TATTMAH 10* «Cl' C«UWUtK..|| »LTtTU»< KF MKKIMVM 19 ■>*«•*IMATSLV B* C>«*> MUK*F'.l*
AN# UN#ER-TRIANGULATION O« 3 UNITING <J> FOkHk LARGE* TETKRHE#*ON FSTTILN AB CD
8 UNIFORM! BOUNDARY DIVISION* GENHRRTED 3 WAV CjRlD --- <WO*MSIC -a- STRUCTURE
With A* Wii* Mwarife. a A fC'siKHKIK* ' K*MA«*
FULLER. RESEARCH FOUNDATION
COPYRIGHTS# 1930
PATENTED U. S R. km CAM***
![]()


Him






FULLXK. RElfiARGH FCUNWHOM FULLER. RESEARCH FOUNDATION
COPYRIGHTED ’ 1950 COPVR.lQHTet> 1950
LOGISTICAL .t.e < - ENERGY - TIME - INPUT-OUTPUT.) EDGE STRUCTURES.
(.STRATEGIC COMPLEX OP TYPES-PARTS- WEIGHTS-
I INVENTORY OF 5-WAY GRID 8UNFF
FORMULA FDR FlNDlKo RAD»U* OF LAKvsfcsT DOME PERMITTED BY MViMAL
3 TYPES VERTEX (.of Which & AXE STAWOiRO AWOHt (-*) eepeAH ToTaL OF )
LO - TRIANGLE FACES (Of which 3 are standard ano 5*« RcibraLO uses)
1G • EDGES C «o pnl-Y foc. diamonds and G intcenal)
G • BASIC DIAMONDS (OF WHICH A- are standard And 2. 2*2 • DIAMONDS X ■ xnside our
8 • DIAMONDS PER ASSEMBLY
G -TO MANUFACTURE
10 • ARROWHEADS JDif^RS ( G *« , lu uses)
. iflHIO • vUtKD FAuTCK CDCL LF IAK«£=T TKiArtoifi *UE OP 7
-aG4» . ALTITUDE CF EquclATEKAl. TkiAMaLt tOcKTKA*- |
I ihtekvals J
is1io» . But. - • igsig • fa^tcc of mayeaia*_» ALT»ruPt R>c s &mcc
a-way g»*-ii>
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT ASSEMBLY COMPLEXITY MUST BE HELD AT MINIMUM FCR UNTRAINED ASSEMBLIES AND ALL MUST BE COLOR 4 SYMBOL CODED ♦ REQUIRE NO SKILLED JOINING FRtHR PRt IOHMLU
FULLER REbEArtCH FCUNUAFCN.'
PArtNTuP ;k3
INtiC
Auy> CAXADA

![]()


CUOtcO AjuAeeo
Ai?c-AAiaLeWlcUoeZ '
£80--A
Z
II* 43’ 51
Z043G
6. 1308
04.5
•3,
II'
ZOI7Z
6.0516
12
10* 14* 10'
17845
9’ 55* 59’
T 52* 54’
@ 9* 25'48’
® I 9* 14’ 54
• 9’or 48-
6* IB’ 37
I73ZO
17226
16440
161240
’ 5. 3535
J.
5. i960
84- 52’ 55
B5* OZ' 00.5'
5. 1676
4.9320
4. 8372
155904- ! 4.7712
14500 4. 3500
.13628
I36ZO
4 0860
85’ 05’ 33
85* 17* 06'
85- 22* 33’
j 85* Z6* 06* I 85’ 50’ 41.!
86* 05’ 36'
86* C5' 40'
13256
1 KS |
6- |
51' AT |
.11972 1 |
| 3.5916 ; |
84’ |
34’ CA..S- j |
i <*> |
6’ |
49* 06* ; |
. 11B 94 |
3. 5GB2 |
86- |
35’ A6* [ |
it |
6* |
46’ 30’ |
.118184 |
3. 54553 I |
84* |
36’ 45’ ji |
4 |
6’ |
45’ 34’ |
.11787 |
3. 53GI |
66' |
37* 13- |i |
O' |
6* |
36* 37’ |
.115296 |
3.4509A |
86' |
41' 41.5H *1 |
t* |
6* |
34* 13’ |
.114606 |
3 4.3 B24 |
86" |
", J *l| 4Z,’ 53. S i| |
& |
G* |
31- 51- |
.11396 |
3.4188 |
86* |
44* C4.5* if |
X? |
6" |
3I‘ AA* |
.11366 --- |
3.4 164 |
BG‘ |
‘‘ ‘ ’ ‘ | 4-4' 08‘‘ j |
e) |
6' |
ZB- 59* |
.113085 |
3 39265 |
86* |
45’ 30.5’ jj |
S |
6’ |
28* 07- |
.113076 |
3.39ZZ8 |
84* |
45’ 31.5* I |
6- |
21' 12* |
.11076 |
3. 5 240 |
86’ |
4-9* 24" S |
|
£ |
6‘‘ |
IB' 43’ |
.110108 |
3.30324 |
86’ |
DO’ ZB. 5* lj fi |
5- |
59’ 00" |
.10400 |
3. IZOO . |
87' |
O* 30* II |
|
3* |
55’ 26* |
.06843 |
2. OS29 |
SB* |
oz’ 17- , |
|
S’ |
53’ 42' |
.06791 |
2. 0373 |
8B’ |
OB’ 14- f| |
|
1
|
||||||
1 |
1
|
|||||
I |
I
|
|||||
3 9768
86* IZ’ 04 5
«?. t?UCUAMA15T&G. puLLE-12 ixarcA 9, 1950
BA61C TClAMGLGr COAlTAlN^,- . ig r»iA.fJaL&s
- IS VtCTlC&S
- 12 E-XT&eiOR tD&66
- IB IMT&BIOR &D&&4.
- 30 EDUeS = C&A1TRA-I- Z$
- 3 PAIR 6 op ID EXIT'CAP EDGES.
- therefore 27 unique edg&e.oiz ARCS OR CENTRAL Z‘.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

» Mi
68 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
The two most important copyrights of 1951 are (1) the general structure of the typical geodesic dome and (2) the specific design of an aluminum vertex. The eightfrequency geodesphere reveals the dual nature of the domes at this stage. It comprises a wooden armature of stacked pentagons, all but one of which are of equal size. The open spaces of this armature are filled by pentagonal panels that project outward with a single vertex. One drawing of this group indicates that the struts are substantial rectangles of solid wood. On the contrary, Fuller’s cast aluminum hub and tube terminal allowed the much faster construction of an aluminum dome that was also much lighter than its wooden counterpart. The assembly of a dome with hubs that called for the fastening of struts to specific points on the hub also entailed many inexpedient readjustments. However, the new aluminum hubs held the flanges on the ends of a strut like a spring clamp that was permanently tightened only after all struts were in place. The design of this hub made it possible to construct geodesic domes on a much larger scale than those made of wood.
Miscellaneous
Geodesic Structures 1951
b.rimplfrl



90 Percent Automatic Cotton Mill, School of Design, North Carolina State College 1951
This hivelike geodesic factory is the quintessence of Fuller’s industrial design strategy, inasmuch as its production was to exceed its expenditure of energy by a wide margin. Illuminated by an omphaloslike opening at the apex of a geodesic dome, the raw cotton was then picked, carded, drawn, roved, spun, spooled, slashed, warped, creeled, loomed, and cleaned in this automatic wonder; unfortunately, only a maquette of the factory was ever executed. The eight floors were supported on cantilevered trusses; the dome provided auxiliary support. The single figure depicted on each floor indicates the drastic reduction in the cost of labor such automation might have effected.
74 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
Ulii. ;
48 SPINNING MACHINES
■tUMw taoacT kmoi or »«■. Ktn ukmh
55* A'j’CVA’iC CGTW*i W LL*
3 DRAWING ■ 3 ROVING FRAMES
90% AUTOMATIC COTTON MILL
48 CARDS
•'«*<*■» rv-LU* atMAiUM PMKCT
tlACUMA BTAtt



![]()

![]()
![]()



![]()
Skybreaks
1951
The architectural importance of the geodesic dome was never more tellingly presented than in this drawing of a skybreak for a theater in Aspen, Colorado. Designed to hold a cantilevered sun screen, the transparent dome is shown superimposed above the testudinate structure it was designed to replace. Fuller’s dome would have eliminated the visual obstruction attending the columnar supports of the traditional structure and would have cost less to build.
Proposed Sixty-four-Foot
Diameter Skybreak for Aspen, Colorado
Skybreak Corporation
of Carolina, 1951
Sixteen-F requency
Geodespherical Skybreak: Icosahedronal Adaptation 1951
t « rouXDKilOH A; .■ <
16 .r r. e a u E. rjx y-g eodespheVcal- sshea kt' A
C llOVkl, KVKVTAT1OM . ! . . '■ <
•Wnnuu.twuq nm>ut «mi . .





Proposal:
A Geodesic Hangar 1951
Fuller designed this hangar with students at M.LT. in 1951 and produced a concept that would lead eventually to his long affiliation with the U.S. Marine Corps. This design surpassed in economy even the elegant reinforced concrete hangars produced by Pierluigi Nervi in wartime Italy because Fuller proposed that they be constructed entirely of styrofoam, tubular aluminum, or superimposed diamonds of fiberglass laminate. Large spherical segments on two sides served as doors that could be rolled open on a tract contiguous with the hangar’s circumference.
H?« U1LLWAI15



Illi
Eighty-Foot Skybreak
(Maquette)
Exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art, 1952
Geodesic Skybreaks Drawn by J. Rauma at M.I.T. 1952
These drawings are important inasmuch as they show an elaborate adaptation of the geodesic dome into a dwelling unit. Fuller himself had produced only one such model for the U.S. Air Force before 1950. perhaps because he was chiefly interested in the geometry' of the domes and in the development of new techniques for their inexpensive construction. The maquette of a similar dwelling made by Fuller ca. 1949 and exhibited at the Museum of Modem Art in New York in 1952 is the ultimate source of the drawings by Rauma.
io
Twenty-Foot Globe of Wooden Slats, Cornell University 1952
Fuller designed this globe for Cornell University in 1952 chiefly to convey the idea of the thirty-one great circles. Shoji Sadao, Fuller’s future partner, then a student of architecture, was a member of the group that built the globe of wooden slats, metal tacks, and bronze mesh representations of the major land masses.
Vortexial Vertexes Fuller Houses, Inc. 1952
These sketches show Fuller’s experiment with the design of a vertex that could be precise, strong, and flexible. The result is a prototype of five metal sockets hinged to each other in a pentagonal configuration, from which wooden struts would radiate.



Jim jyco , 3ZfSQ
Sixteen- F requency
Chord Factors 1952
These chords embody the geometric formula for a geodesic dome.
Spherical Truss for the Ford Motor Company Courtesy Building 1952-1953
This aluminum and polyester dome (spanning a ninety- three-foot rotunda of the Ford Motor Company’s Courtesy Building in Dearborn, Michigan) weighs only eight and a half tons but changed the course of modern architecture. It represents the first major corporate sponsorship of an architectural principle, which, though over a quarter of a century old, was still extremely futuristic as of 1953. Triangular subassemblies of aluminum make up the fifteen tetrahedra of the larger triangular trusses that are connected to hubs and clad in polyester resin. The success of the geodesic dome can be attributed in part to the stunning photograph of this advanced crystalline hemisphere published in Life magazine. More important than its scale and size was the fact that this dome became like an icon of the Ford Motor Company and a harbinger of the corporate patronage of modern architecure that occurred across the country shortly thereafter.









. -5-.;




R. BUCKMIH5TER CULLLR dssignkr and contractor
SPUiRlCAL TRU55 EQS CORP MOTOR CQM5AUV COURTS J*/ BUXk
stcriou Tuaoum sxicu saso AMD PARAPET LADCGG. GOJMGCTfOJ
SklOW SMEDS
SPHERICAL. TRUSS PCft PCGO MOTOR. CCHPAMV CouQTES* BUS.

![]()
![]()
![]()

6U6A5SEMSLY CON.NEC" MEM BEE ( BY TBIANGLEG)
|
r O B 6 LENGTH QUANTITY Ife.qOT" -Z4O IB. OSes- 400 18.7^10’ -240 IT. q 67 ’ 4- 8>O II. Ifc7l " -240 18. qfc - 240
|
|
'.SPHECICAL TRUSS FOR FOOD MOTOG COAAPAMY COURTESY BLDG DEABBOBN, UICM.
|
||
V.K FULLER HEW YO BK, N.Y |
DESIGNED AND CONTDACTOE |
|
SEPT. 18 , 1962 |
t2EpeS3A/C£ sueer ~J op ta |
|




FINAL -SEKTICN . ■By FCfZt> MTOR tfMAWy
10 M PILL ■SIZE

![]()
min
J PUN ALUM. HUb CAP •f iauuaArta awatrta Auku. i
srtir- rjrrruujrcJlPlJir srtlP
PoLt'Ajrte. PwatAU thaa
3a‘M}N awzoure rwfH££(aso'*iH.) 3a-'a-N£4PxtNE eusBir spsKt-T. l-EU3££e WMHPZ HOU. 'll THICK i-o^M euBitu sroppteI’eux
HUP> CAP OE-TAIL^
PULI. 3CAL&.
UOTPi :
Hui OPP TO Ab CU T-BT TUPALlbA. AS SHOWN
J/VB CulP TO BB
MAJUJidl^N CQBB
/A 300 T/2LMM Pf/’Ti 6-9100 (Mr. Tatlo^
'CUT L/fJPz"oN CAP
Tumal DKbifUA ol Hub Cap dewef/c £om£-
- .ucrfXTre
![]()
![]()


pfzA. LtbAO Holas ar tma
(6 TirAL lm ajlcpk PalClpm) axa ra aa /baxjjpXO Jaxth ra ^rAric/tr- gurrs** cfi- rnus.
HAAT'XeX!
roAtn OB’ £-4zir-3 JU.jAAArg
JiK. BiA.'£l£AO A^£Z$ TO BAl bS^
Axs£4&4£ir to ao: Aeo*£: J6O* -er" r*4.
2m. (3^ ^JLCT(OM)
T^ 6 £.*AT ^OtAS TO AC. £XiU.AA Ar/TAf ^JSO
TO rAfin Ba., ZirATA.
Total jesou/ACD 73^
P/MAL DPAPIM3 OP PUTLTh pAI^LBlAP.
£!e»Mi • £oruNZSA AufiM^o
CbiiaxBt. P- ^/rnumLP Eli:u.







1
^35
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTIOxN, PART 1 137


j •



![]()









- r-l e > *• r* ■ •
-
Li’taci u*«uAt c.m o» u»r»m"n(


![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()









![]()
146 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1


148 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1


Experimental
Greenhouse, School of
Design, North Carolina State College 1953
The experimental greenhouse erected at North Carolina State College was an academic exercise for Fuller’s students to test the feasibility of the Skybreak designs that preceded it. Its wooden structure was hoisted and supported on a single mast and provided support for two veils of suspended Saran that served both as insulation and fenestration.
DETAIL 3
SCALE • </2 EULL sac



![]()






patterns for S' RADIUS skin
SARAN SKIN PATTERNS



![]()


![]()
Dome Project, University of Minnesota, School of Architecture
Winter---Spring Quarter, 1953
The Fuller dome at the University of Minnesota was relatively large for an academic experiment, comprising ten wooden subdivisions. All wooden components were color coded according to their dimension in this first realization of an idea that dates to 1951.
5PAC1R BUCK bL TAILS
ivLvaui antutikui'
tKiiuui < C4t»t..«n» h t & tuut*. »i mitf mi »ln 'ii>


![]()
![]()







lUUlk bQMl F-ROJLCT itaisL st- At.taiTtt.TutL UWLLMTT M|kH. Ifltui VLntt |
i n it |
>lAWm« • llAMllft 414 |
lain* |
LT.SW 4 "ISWKMV.W- |
|

![]()
![]()


AZIMUTh JIG
Ct TAILS)
T/FICAl KNOT DIAGRAMS


![]()



![]()
![]()



Geodesic Dome, University of Oregon, School of Architecture and Allied Arts
The dome executed by students of the University of Oregon in 1953 is distinguished from the other academic experiments by two features---its exterior geodesic ladder that conforms to the curvature of the hemisphere and its pentagonal door.
1953
s ('* i
f |
|
1
|
||
L • I |
||

![]()


ufc'./c i?' ./ wuou
M O bl.S’ It’’ * bOAl _
U.UCK/AIM5TLR UHIR
MORWiAY
11
-f





PROCUREwTENT \ MA.TERIM-5 CONTROL



![]()
Octahedron-Tetrahedron
Truss
1953
The invention of the octahedron-tetrahedron truss was a concurrent development to that of the geodesic dome in the architectural career of Buckminster Fuller. It was employed almost immediately after its invention in the design of the new service garage for the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company of Hyannis, Massachusetts, and provided both shelter for the automobiles and support for the overhead doors. The truss is aluminum; the walls are cinder block; and the whole structure is protected from the elements with a coating of latex vinyl.
A
aa^aVaFaT/’isB
»VA»A*A»aVaVaTaVTa'®B

![]()



![]()
Proposal for a Service Garage, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Hyannis, Massachusetts 1953
ilk H



Geodesic Radome for Project Lincoln, M.LT. 1953
The radome was developed by Fuller and his students at M.LT. in December 1953 as Project Lincoln, Fuller’s first design for the defense of the United States during the Cold War. The term ‘‘radome’’ alludes to radar protection. Bell Laboratories and Western Electric manufactured these structures to house radar equipment along the Distant Early Warning line during the 1950s. They are geodesic domes composed of rigid sheets of fiberglass in hexagonal and pentagonal forms, the flanges of which are lined with plastic gaskets and are latched or bolted together. Thus there is no need of a metal or wooden superstructure, reducing the overall weight and cost but none of the dome’s compressive strength.
Discontinuous
Compression Sphere,
School of Architecture,
Princeton University
1953
Tensegrity, a concept Fuller explored during the late forties, obtained its maximum coherence in his erection of the discontinuous compression and continuous tension sphere at Princeton University in 1953. Made up of ninety aluminum pipe struts held in place with tense wire cables projecting from each end, this seemingly magical, dematerialized orb was rebuilt later in 1959 and exhibited at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
uiXZOiT GJKgaiX»QH 3PKU




These light fiberglass components were much easier to assemble with plastic pins and comma-shaped cams than they were to design. Every angle and dimension were critical to structural integrity.
Radomes
1954
- BASKET A* SPECIFIED
- GA^ET AS JZWElVFP
BASKET fOK HEX-PENT FULLER EWUE (PAT.ZWZm) |
Z!«|54- |
ZSEODE516S IKI.C. 4 &EATTLE STREET. ^AUPKIPCE B&MASS TELFPHOkle TK-AMU |
|
i • / r_ji |
|
r |
r -rJ |

![]()


Fifty-Foot Magnesium Geodesic Hangar for the U.S. Marine Corps 1954
These helicopter hangars are developments of the earlier ones, but they are smaller, less expensive, and can actually be transported by the vehicles they were designed to house. The structure is magnesium extruded struts and is covered by tent material tailored somewhat like a Dymaxion World Map. This fabric cover is zipped into a shape that conforms perfectly to the contours of the dome. The popular image of these hangers dangling from helicopters was prescient of Fuller’s later design for superbuoyant spherical cities, the vast weights of which would be sufficiently lighter than the surrounding atmosphere to produce the largest dirigibles ever designed.
![]()




![]()
![]()
£sQD* <I33§SDaS0&Sn<32
ap©as 'ffBSDg ©. ss. S4id?sHans®E axnw>s
as. asaragnaOTagaa a^osas ° Mgsawagas
4.
GUSSET PLATE DETAILS
5.
H tt U 4 . _ a - T ►
mm- BUB-ASSEMBLY
|
SECTION
|
LENGTH OF MEMBER
INCHES |
NO. RED’D PER SUB ASSEMBLY |
LENGTH OF MEMBER FEET |
TOTAL NQ OF MEMBERS |
TOTAL LENGTH FEKT |
WT./PC.
|
TOTAL WT |
REE DWG. |
REMARKS
|
||||||
zOB° i
|
1 |
[
|
100.6216'
|
2 LA |
640179* |
GO LA" |
5041074* |
2.A95*
|
I4.9l40* |
22B |
|
|||||
W o fl
|
[ |
looeziG’
|
2CA |
640179* |
GO LA’ |
504.107-1* |
2.495*
|
14-9.40* |
22, Cs |
|||||||
|
[ |
I0Q82I6’
|
ZEA |
640179 |
50 LA* |
4200895* |
ZA95*
|
124 35* |
22,Gs |
|||||||
nw ° $
|
[ |
1006216’
|
ZEA |
640179 |
10 LA.’ |
84.0175 |
Z.495*
|
24.95* |
22® |
|||||||
O£> o 22
|
c
|
108 8540’
|
ZEA |
907IIG* |
50 LA’ |
453555' |
2.R9O*
|
134.50’ |
22® |
|||||||
OD° <
|
c
|
1063540*
|
ZEA |
907116* |
.0 LA. ’ |
90.7116* |
2.6,90*
|
26.94* |
22® |
|||||||
zOD ° J
|
1 |
T
|
163.236’
|
ILA. |
13.6050* |
30 LA |
406.090* |
3.4AJ.’
|
103.24* |
M |
||||||
D® o 22
|
T
|
165.432*
|
LA |
15 2301’ |
25 LA |
362.2525* |
3 ate-
|
M |
||||||||
D® ° $
|
[
|
93.; 40*
|
ZEA. |
7.700* |
IOLA’ |
7760* |
1 9)0*
|
2S.I0* |
M |
|||||||
M)° $
|
93.360’
|
ZEA |
7.760* |
IOLA.’ |
77.60' |
Z 310*
|
23. >0* |
|||||||||
W o
|
& |
I
|
3B.O52’
|
ILA |
3.171* |
IOLA* |
3171* |
0-941*
|
«.4I* |
|||||||
OD° $
|
I
|
55.9G8‘
|
ILA |
4614* |
IDEA.’ |
46.64* |
t3S5*
|
13.95* |
23® |
|||||||
fl |
I
|
IIGB2G0*
|
IEA |
97355* |
60 LA |
584.130* |
2-B9O**
|
n5.4<i» |
22® |
|||||||
o 22
|
I
|
940156’
|
IEA |
75346* |
50 LA’ |
391.730* |
2.3 3C*
|
II <4 SO* |
22® |
|||||||
TOTALS
|
• SEE NOTE UNDER ’REMARKS |
3zcG.4oia; c 'AO’SG^ii^ TOTAL |
1 tfc8.CC* |
|||||||||||||
SLBASSEkED |
HOREDtf |
rt/SUBA&
|
TOTAL WX
|
REE DWG. |
|
|||||||||||
fl |
30 EA |
1316*
|
575.40*
|
|||||||||||||
22 |
25 tA |
1866*
|
472.00*
|
|||||||||||||
0 0
|
5 LA
|
11.46*
|
57.40*
|
|||||||||||||
bnernoeH subassembly schedule
|
||||||||||||||||
n
|
||||||||||||||||
5EA |
12.76*
|
6360*
1168.60* |
so magnesium gcoocsic helicopter hanger for the US. marine corps
r buchminster fuller designer forest hills,n.y. |
«oau^ *7 43/54 B by caldtvcll Jreuisions . |
||||||||||||


s unfh end cds reversed
5 unth end a/h reversed
io with end cuts reversed
HMM
individual member detai
|
s |
|
5o‘ magnesium geodesic helicopter hanger for u. s. marine corps |
date: 4/24,/m bg: taqlor revisions:
|
OX) q!)
|
r. buckminster fuller, designer fore At hills, ru| |
||


DPS3 ° £2 EPfl ° S3 GO PLOD color code - blue
drift Cf9G&afcte» m *erb»rO CD-4 4 CO 4
JPS3 ° oC ° 41 co prop color code - red




![]()


![]()
° £2 BPfl ° 41 GO DEQ'D color code - blue
assembly plan
50* hiacjnesium efeodcsic helicopter honour for I be US marinecorpu
dote 4^'r4- Ly OiK'WgU r*jvr^yjns>
[rbuchminstar fuller 11 June issh-


![]()
Staler •r-O*
Scale '•+ * r-o*
assembly ■ elevation
50 rnaqnesmrn geodesc data V2r/5T4. helicopter hanger for the US. mar.ne corps r bucbrrwsler fuller designer, forest btU^ny
byCaid*M]|
OfiB



![]()
![]()
OZ UJ
(r o Li
en
2
O
CO
S3 er
x
UJ
S
ZD
CO UJ Z CD
<
er
LU
x
CD
ZD
m
tr
UJ tr 3 h--- O 3 tr H W
MAGNESIUM EXTRUSIONS FOR 50' GEODESIC STRUCTURE R. BUCKMINSTER FULLER --- DESIGNER

![]()
![]()
![]()


![]()

Tenting for the Fifty-Foot Magnesium Hangar for the U.S.
Marine Corps 1954
Geodesic Dome Patent
6/29/54
Fuller designed the geodesic dome in the course of his more general attempts to discover nature’s own coordinate system. The lightness of modern alloys and plastics and the properties of geodesic structure allow a scale and afford a strength impossible in masonry construction.
June 29, 1954 r. b. fuller 2,682,235
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Filed Dec. 12, 1951 6 Sheets-Sheet 1
June 29, 1954
Filed Deo. 12, 1951
R. B. FULLER
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
2,682,235
8 Sheet»-Sheet 2
June 29, 1954
Filed Dec. 12, 1951
R. B. FULLER
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
2,682^35
6 Sbeet»>£heet 3
June 29, 1954
Filed Deo. 12, 1951
R. B. FULLER
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
2,682^35
6 Sheeta-Sbeet 4
INVDiTOJL
UlCHMD BUCXMIHSTIR FULLER
ATTORNEY





![]()
June 29, 1954 a b. fuller 2,682,235
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Filed Deo, 12, 1951 6 Sheete-Sheet 6
in i ii ii
Geodesic Dome, Set of Four Studies 1954
‘‘Skyeye’’ Radio Telescope Designed with Charles Eames 1954
The ‘‘Skyeye’’ was designed to have a 100-foot parabolic reflector facing the sky and cradled by two arc trusses supported on four pylons. The architectural elements are by Eames, and the eye itself is a geodesic hemisphere.
Fifty-five-Foot Geodesic Dome Hangar, U.S.
Marine Corps
1954-1955
This variation on the portable geodesic hangar has two louver doors and a marquee. Instead of being covered by a one-piece skin, as were Fuller’s earlier hangars, it has individual canvas panels lashed onto the metal structure.
Radomes
1954-1956
Thirty-one-Foot Radome on the Hex-Pent Pattern (Lincoln) 1954
The significance of this newer version of the radome is the shape of its fiberglass panels, which are hexagonal and pentagonal rather than triangular. Moreover, these panels are now reinforced by carefully designed V-shaped flanges fused to their inner faces.
Diamond B Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome
This radome is distinguished by its diamond panels.
1954
Hex A Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Fuller Radome 1954
Spider A Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome
1954
Radome Door Handle
1954
Twenty-one-Foot Fuller
Radome on the Hex-Pent
Pattern (Lincoln)
1954
The flanges of each panel are held together with pins that are secured by the pressure of a cam-shaped clamp.
FULLER RADOME - Va SPHERE --- IO' G" RADIUS
SU FOOT DlAMETHR Zfa CPMERE TO
MOOSE EQUlPMEVr TP4 I
COMPRISING C. PPM TA COW AU PIECES (ONE WITH VEHTIUATCR}
2-0 HEXAGONAL. PIECES HATCH')
ST BASE PIECES
DESIGN COVERED EM U.S. pHEJJT WG 2.G92.2S5 AND OTHERS-


tesre: mum ca<cn n fumv
PULL <J7E SECTION CC
FLAN PROJECTION rx* ; • txt
SECTION AA
![]()

![]()

![]()


Fuller Radomes
These radome panels have flanges that are built in rather than welded to the polygonal surfaces.
(General): Flanges
and Panels
1954
Ar&nwre o^xirr at - voenix
FX14- ®2E P€TA._





![]()






YENTILATCE. DETAIL >«*: iRxrr
EXTERIOR ELEVATION
SCHEMATIC SECTION **: i»w
![]()




![]()
![]()
.40 to cT.ObZZ
SCALE : 4’* I’
NOTES* ••
PIE MMRJMEP TO <SONV£NT1ONAL TOLEKAWCES
EXTRUSION TOLERANCE TO BE
* */U OUTSIPE PIM.
EXTRUSION MATERIAL’ TO BE
BASKET FOR I4EX.-PENT FULLER RADOME <FATEMTEP)
6EODE6I6^ : IN6. 4 & RATTLE STREET. dTAMBRIP6& MAS£.





SSO I _O£’I _OOT
FASTENER PIN 'A' FULLER BWME fPATENTEP) |
iqfca/54- |
dEODESICS INC. 4 SEATTLE 4TREET. rJAMBKIPOE 9S MA54 TELEPHONE TK-4-9444 |
M2 S OP 1 Ummmm |
NOTE'S:
PIE MA4MMEP TO 40UVEKU0NAL TOLHZAitdK
S6ALE: 4‘- I'
BASKET FOE HEX-PENT FULLB?mOKE (m.ZUZZi^ |
lOtolM-’ BEK |
atovtsics inc.
|
a |



G£NE£AL DETAILS bd BASE DIA.
13 v FULLtt EAPOMfi. FW OMOt
GEOPeDICS. INC .. 4 ma eh4. of?ze * 4DiAmr a . J
OUO.JilH. -TFfrtlrt. ''
4 BEATTUX
GENERAL DETAILS 50* BASE' ' 10 y FULLER gADOHE.FAI ltt/215
GEODESICS , INC 50 "10 WIVI ENGLAND GHICE





![]()
![]()

![]()
Fuller Radomes
(General): Warehouse
Preliminary 112-Foot
Diameter
1954
This preliminary project for a warehouse shows a refinement of the typical radome panel. The acute ends of each diamond shape are cut off in an arc that forms a series of fiberglass-covered yeux-de-boeufs when all the panels are assembled. Artificial illumination during the day is unnecessary with this design because of the translucent surface material employed.


TRIG Structural System 1954
TRIC is the trademark for the Fuller structural system that comprises a truss made of stamped cardboard that produces a three-dimensional construction triangle when cut and assembled.
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1 23o




236 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1


Dome Units for Geodesics
(Paperboard)
Mid 1950s
Triennale, Milan Exposition Domes, 1954 Eight-Frequency Fiberboard Plastic Geodesic Structure, Thirty-six-Foot Diameter; Sixteen-Frequency Fiberboard Plastic Geodesic Structure, Seventy-two-Foot Diameter
Two types of Fuller’s dome were represented in the Triennale of 1954 in Milan. Both were made of fiberboard plastic. The larger seems to have been designed as a hangar.
**R_FRFQUENCY FIBERBOARD PLASTIC GEOOE9C STRUCTURE 36* DIAMETER hruckmikster fuller **mSSIGKER
TRIENNALE 1954
Fastener Cam for Radomes 1955
Finally in 1955, the fastener cam for Fuller’s radomes was designed at extremely precise tolerances. The curved end is hooked through the pin that holds the fiberglass panels together.
117-Foot Geodesic Dome, Six-Plane Maintenance
Hangar
1955
This hangar, which was over twenty feet larger than the Ford dome, was commissioned by the U.S. Air Force. Perhaps because of its great dimensions, it was constructed of individual metal trusses with custom-made gussets and hubs. Like the earlier hangars, it has two sliding doors, but, unlike them, it was ventilated from its apex.
•
■ Hi.fc-wl'r
' " 1 ! ’ . i- a i ® .. 1 'AT' AW G A \ |
||
-» • • - j-/ _2_ .' |
||
|
||
|
||
------
|
||
." I.’ ’ ’ *
|
||
T
262 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION. P/\RT 1 263


------------’’

![]()
Fifty-five-Foot
Geodesic Hangar 1955




282 the: geodesic revolution. PART 1
; ' h r
Fifty-Foot Base Diameter Radome 1955
The radome was redesigned in 1955 to include a circular fiberglass hub. This node afforded the structure greater compressive strength since the acute angles of the diamonds were blunted and focused on a dense, circular target. The pins were made shorter and stronger.
D HUB
21 •* »•'*’
50 90
JCTlUfiM T-XK-6 A£K 35 B4$C
FlfcCi
'SOUt _MA»W ** z u as cmoto ok |
KktYMWh 4 rUTs -<•' VJJJJHR
FVLkXt RAFCMI "W «*«»*» |
|
rctH t,T3~p r * |
GEODESICS. INC. |
5014-5 |
--- |
4 ETATTLR *»T„tT CAMBttDiX »■ MM*» Tl-fe B444 |
|



Fastener Pin A
1955
to
§
§1
8
ELEVATION
6E6TION B-B
NOT TO 6CJU.E
PMH Of OJ&. PQYIN6 BE INFO KI NO
FASTENER PIN K FULLER 0kPOME VfLZl^ZZK |
BEK! |
GEOV&>\C$ IN6.
TELEPHONE TZ-4-MU |
2» |
TUK> PEAW1NC K THE PEOPEBTV of aropKics inc. all u« « FOe»IPPE+J EXCEPT ON WKITTFU CPN5ENT.
![]()



F orty-F oot Paperboard Dome 1955
The forty-foot paperboard dome is significant as a relatively large structure composed entirely of paper. Theoretically, the ratio of tensile strength to weight is great in such a building.
Door Handle Assembly for a Radome
The most elegant version of the door latch for the geodesic dome was devised in 1955. It was manufactured in black industrial laminate.
1955
U.S. Marine Corps--- F.F. 42 V2 S. Preliminary 1955
This is a paperboard strip dome of unknown function.
Thirty-two-Foot-Diameter
Rigid Radome
1955
The rigid radome is composed of stiff fiberglass components; the air-inflated radome is a flexible structure. This version of the rigid structure has triangular panels instead of hexagonal, pentagonal, or diamond-shaped ones.




![]()






Homestyle Center Foundation, Geodesic Dome House, Grand Rapids, Michigan 1955
The molded polyester fiberglass units of this dome are hexagons modified by corner arcs that form porthole fenestration. Visually, however, the raised molded flanges of each panel suggest that each window is the center of a triangular unit. Like the Skybreak designs, the Homestyle Center Dome House was to be lit abundantly. Interior trusses supported the geometric platforms of living spaces. This is the first fully articulated geodesic dome dwelling and resembles the Dymaxion House of a quarter century earlier in several of its details. None of Fuller’s earlier domestic designs matches the spatial luxury of this dome.
U OM ESTYlE DESIGNED BY
CENTER FOUNDATION - GEODESIC
S T E B F U L L E. «
JAMES FITZ G ' b It o M ASAOCiA-rn
DOME HOU.SE GRAND E API DS MICH.
5YHEBGE.TICS, INC. eaucigh m.c. Bgt,o „„
Final Version of the Radome (Fifty-Foot Diameter): Flange and Vertex Details 1955
The final version of the Fuller radome has molded hubs of polyester and a molded ring gasket. The hubs are hexagonal, and the radome’s beveled corners form small triangles filled with a rubber plug. The larger fiberglass panels are roughly diamond-shaped. Although this version of the radome was more complex to fabricate, the structural complications ultimately provided greater stability. The many sketches attending this new design are testimony of its greater intricacy.






![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()

![]()



-f MS

![]()





324 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1





![]()
![]()





![]()


aw TUJ XJT5OV
ceoobs.ckevo.mk^ 33
Homestyle Center
Foundation, Geodesic
Exhibition House, Grand
Rapids, Michigan
1956
The exhibition house of the Homestyle Center was more advanced than the foundation’s main dome house in its fenestration and ecological ventilation. It has a stainless steel frame and a polyester fiberglass involute weather surface. The dome was constructed of translucent fiberglass panels. Octet trusses support the inner spaces. With such a generous illumination, the indoors becomes the outdoors, making the dramatic sun shades suspended from the dome’s interior de rigueur during summer. One diagram indicates how the house remains cool during the warmer months and warm during the winter. Even the car is afforded protection in the driveway that runs under the first floor beside the swimming pool.
U.S. Air Force, Rome Air Development Center, Rome, New York 1955
The Air Development Center in Rome, New York, is a rigid radome with diamond-shaped panels attached to hexagonal hubs and is set on a metal truss platform.









BA *
SECTION
|X56PX65J3
FLANGE ELEVATIONS
irr NOTE 2
' xstpsessa
3A5£ D-
r |
|||
OJMHTTT BSD
|
|||
U & Ml FOKX
|
|||
|
|||


![]()




wn


Swimming Pool Designs
1955 & 1956
These five geodesic vaults above a swimming pool (1956) were probably covered by a flexible transparent material and served to protect the pool’s occupants from wind and cold weather. The plastic pool prototype was designed according to the geodesic principles of the radome for Lunn Laminates, Inc., in 1955.
TRANSVERSE SECTION
LONCrWPlNAL SECTION
|
|
SCALE r.v |
|
DRAWN ~ IMmURUDOT DXTC CHICKED DAlu |
|
4Br«ttl«S*. Canbrldfa, Mm«. T«U»U«« Tltnri«U<» W4M |
|
Geodesic Dome
Greenhouse 1956
The geodesic dome greenhouse is a system of polyester fiberglass sheets in catenary conformation, suspended from a standard aluminum frame.




![]()
![]()



![]()
Geodesic Dome: Outdoor
Circle Theater, San Mateo
County, California 1956
This outdoor theater is composed of paired hexagonal aluminum units held in a tense relationship by the twelve tie lines that intersect in a single node. The same structural principle is found in the bicycle wheel
Plydome Studies 1956
Like those of the radome, the panels of the plydome channel the stress caused by the force of gravity. However, the plydome is made of laminated wood, which is no stronger than polyester fiberglass but is considerably more economical. Moreover, the plywood panels are merely bent into the final domical shape during construction. Thus, the design tolerances involved are relatively less rigorous than those for molded polyester panels. Although less refined than his radomes, Fuller’s plydomes are cheaper and more elegant designs.












100-Foot Geodesic Trade Fair Dome (Pictures) 1956
Ten-Foot-Diameter Sphere to Stand in the 100-Foot Geodesic Dome at the Bangkok Trade Fair Designed and Executed by Duncan Stuart, 1956
This sculpture by Duncan Stuart is a modified geodesic globe that stood on the interior of Fuller’s exhibition dome like a chattra for a Buddhist stupa. This landmark was the cynosure of the Bangkok fair of 1956. Stuart’s sculpture is of polychromed, anodized aluminum.
8®
Ball Park Intended for the Yomiuri Giants, Tokyo 1956
The height of this geodesic saucer dome would have daunted any home run or fugitive fly ball. The code name for the project was Tokyo 750, which refers to the diameter of the dome. The sponsor was to be Yomiuri, who gave his name both to a Tokyo-based newspaper and to a baseball team. Fuller’s representatives in Japan claimed the stadium could be built for a very- low cost. Yomiuri’s consultants eventually advised him against such a speculative real estate investment, and the project did not proceed beyond this handsome group of preliminary renderings. Had the ball park been constructed, it would have contained the largest man-made space. Eventually, Yomiuri built one of Fuller’s geodesic domes to house a putting green and club at the Yomiuri Golf Course.
►roM: &HOJI aAIXC>
2, z-cmomv, «UCM> CJiiyoCA-Atf, I*'**’




Geodesic Office Building for the Savogran Company, Norwood, Massachusetts 1957
The Savogran Company was extremely precocious in adopting the geodesic dome for its office building. The firm was apparently more interested in the possibilities of an innovative building design than in economic considerations.
Union Tank Car
Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Dome and Exedra 1957
Fuller designed this 384-foot geodesic dome for a site in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. It is the largest permanent dome since the Ford commission of 1952 and is one of the first designs to incorporate geodesic structures other than the dome. The long entrance pavilion and the triangular hub are novelties in this design.




![]()












Twenty-nine-F oot- Diameter Plydome 1957
Five plywood panels form the vertexes of this dome. Each is secured to the other with bolts along the intersecting edges. There is a total of sixty-four panels of various sizes.





Ski Lodge Design No. 2
Wurster-Bernardi & Emmons, Architects, 1957
This is another example of an architectural firm that used Fuller’s dome in a design with a private and luxurious function. The strength of the dome protected against strong winds and snow drifts, and its materials allowed the sun’s rays to penetrate. The entrance and stairs of this lodge were to be decided by the patrons or the architect. The second story is marked on the exterior by a more intricate fenestration.


Fifty-five-Foot and Thirty-six-Foot Diameter Geodesic Frame and Sheet Domes 1957
This dome of wood slats is notable for the cruciform armature that necessitates hubs of several types. It was to be clad in inexpensive panels of homasote secured with tacks.
|
DIAMET |
ED GEODESIC |
eau«mkC |
ttSXXICM |
1 |
|
D 3U££1 |
' DOME |
£-‘--- K"'"*•’’■*• Li’ ‘‘»> ■<•>' u AsrVD 1^1 ~T- |
-• |
|
BASE IZIMG DETAIL SAME AS AS* OOMC.


PQOCEDUGE1
BASE RING
TYPICAL SEGMENT
STEFA
£.RfctT|pN
AP?llCATiOH.a:~MG7AgOTE PANELS
rar
61 \ ‘Z 1 |
’ 6R |
» dome


Typical Raft System for Thirty-six-Foot Homasote 1958
rmcAc farr fa >*
Mr)ASOT£ K'
This complicated dome of narrow wood slats that are tacked together is one of Fuller’s strongest wood designs due to the dense overlapping of components. A narrow channel cuts the dome in half.
Octahedron Truss 1959
The octahedron truss, devised as early as 1952, was capable of being shaped into the following geometric volumes: the sphere, the torus, and the cylinder.
The paperboard dome affords further proof that economy is the first priority in Fuller’s designs. Although less attractive, strong, and durable than aluminum, wood, or steel, paperboard is, nevertheless, far cheaper. Furthermore, paperboard is manufactured all over the world, a fact which should have made Fuller’s new dome as ubiquitous as the standard packing crate. If coated with a thin layer of vinyl, it becomes not only much stronger, but also completely weather resistant. It would thus be viable shelter for both the torrid and frigid zones.
Paperboard Dome Patent 4/14/59
The design comprises a grouping of triangular, volumetric frames that are locked together by plastic dowels. Each unit is assembled from a rectangular sheet of corrugated fiberboard, the two smooth outer sheets of which weigh only thirty-eight pounds per 1,000 square feet. The corrugated interior has fifty-five flutes per foot, but the whole is only one-tenth inch thick. The triangular frames have open channels on the interior, into which is inserted a triangular flat panel of paperboard. These domes also have been used as centering to support an outer shell of concrete.
402 THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1
April 14, 1959 r. B. fuller 2,881,717
BUILDINC CONSTRUCTION
April 14, 1959
2,881,717
Fll»4 Ju. 24, 1988
3 Sbsats-Shaat 3
OHNFYS
R. B. FULLER
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION



![]()


Plydome Patent 9/22/59
Plywood of any thickness is much stronger than paperboard. Moreover, plywood need not be weatherproofed to survive. Perhaps for these reasons, Fuller developed the plydome. Clearly more expensive than paperboard, plywood, nevertheless, can be constructed into a dome of greater design elegance. With the help of trigonometry, one can locate holes along the edges of rectangular plywood panels that are easily bent and bolted into a dome.
Sept. 22, 1959 r. q. fuller 2,905,113
SELF-STRUTTED GEODESIC PLYDOME
Filed April 22, 1957 3 Sheets-Sheet 1
INVENTOR.
Ihnngs, ncHAAD Buckminster fuller


![]()

![]()

Catenary Geodesic Tent Patent 11/24/59
This aptly named invention hangs on small chains from the vertices of a standard, aluminum geodesic dome. These chains are pulled through openings in the hubs of the aluminum frame until the tent is taut. The tent itself is tailored to produce hyperbolic paraboloids, the vertices of which are contiguous with those of the frame. The benefit of this design is the complete stability of the hanging tent---whether it is made of canvas or molded fiberglass---under the stresses of ambient winds. (See Homestyle Center Foundation, Geodesic Exhibition House.)
Not. 24, 1959
ni«d March 1, 1967
R. B. FULLER
GEODESIC TENT
2,914,074
4 Sh»at»-Sh««t 2
It n as a 3
Nov. 24, 1959 r. b. fuller 2,914,074
GEODESIC TENT
FlUd March 1, 1957 4 ShMta-Sbuat 3
Nov. 24, 1959
R. B. FULLER
GEODESIC TENT
2,914,074
Filed March 1, 1957
4 Shoets-Shoet 4
Jtnase 77
itiraso £8
INVENTOR.
RICHARD BUCKMINSTER FULLER



![]()



![]()
U.S. Air Force Academy Field House
1959
The field house would have been large enough to accommodate a football field surrounded by a running track, a basketball stadium, a hockey rink, portable fencing and wrestling floors, portable viewing stands, and a permanent triangular core housing offices and lockers. The diameter of the dome would have been 400 feet.
SECTION A SECDON A









THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION. PART 1 409
Museum of Modern Art
Octahedron-Tetrahedron
Truss and Tensegrity Mast
1959
The strength and lightness of the octahedron-tetrahedron truss was demonstrated most effectively by the one Fuller installed at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York in 1959. Practically filling the width of the garden designed by Philip Johnson, the h- shaped truss impressed the viewer with the fifty-foot span of its lintel that was cantilevered twenty feet above the marble pavement.
The tensegrity mast was another work exhibited by Fuller in the MOMA exhibition. Although quite impressive when installed in the museum’s garden, it provided an even greater spectacle when carried by Fuller’s assistants through the streets of Manhattan.
THE GEODESIC REVOLUTION, PART 1 411



PLAN Itof view)
ELEVATION
Tensegrity Mast
Installation at MOMA 1959
Dome by Synergetics for the North American Aviation Company Erected over the Buildings and Grounds of the National Headquarters of the American Society for Metals, Cleveland, Ohio, 1959
Synergetics, a Raleigh, North Carolina company, produced the design for this umbrellalike geodesic dome supported on five triangular trusses. The dome’s edges curve gently upward from these supports, showing Fuller’s attempt in later domes to achieve architectural effects. The dome straddles the headquarters of the American Society for Metals.
3013 inu.iuo.70 liAl • JCH. N. C.




invewnsv M.R tuxuiMSTT«k Fou-EK