1052.360 Mite as Model for Quark

1052.361 Proofs must proceed from the minimum whole system to Universe and the differentiatiori-out of Universe of the special case conceptual system. Proofs must start from the minimum something that is the minimum structural system. All geometrical and numerical values derive from fractionation of the whole.

1052.362 At the maximum limit of the rational cosmic hierarchy of primitive structural systems we have the 120 similar and symmetrical T Quanta Module tetrahedra that agglomerate symmetrically to form the triacontahedron. (See Sec. 986.) At the minimum limit of the hierarchy are the separate A, B, and T Quanta Modules, and at the minimum limit of allspace-filling—ergo, of all Universe structuring—we have the three-module mites consisting each of two A and one B Modules.

1052.363 The mites are the quarks. The two energy-holding A Quanta Modules and the one energy-dispersing B Quanta Module of which the mite is composited exactly correspond with the plus-two, minus-one characteristics model of the three-separate-entity functions of the quark. (See Secs. 262.04 and 262.05.)

1052.40 Vector Equilibrium and Icosahedron: Ratio of Gravitational and Electromagnetic Constants: The vector equilibrium and the icosahedron are the same initial twentyness. But the icosahedron is always in either a positive limit or a negative limit phase of its, only-pulsatingly attained, first-degree structural self-stabilization in the asymmetric transformation of the vector equilibrium, which alternating pulsations are propagated by the eternally opposed, radiant-attractive, always dualistic, inter-self-transform- able potential of ideally conceptual unity of Universe.

1052.41 The icosahedral phase of self-structuring is identifiable uniquely with the electron, whose mass relationship to the proton is as 1 : 18.51, whereas the icosahedron’s volume is to the vector equilibrium’s volume as 20 : 18.51. In this connection it is significant that the vector equilibrium’s plural unity is 20, ergo we may say the relationship is as unity : 18.51.

1052.42 The number of icosahedral electrons is always equal to the number of protons that are in the vector equilibrium’s idealized form of the same surface layer phenomenon.

1052.43 The nonnucleated icosahedron can and does maintain only one single, one-wave-deep, external layer of omnicircumferentially, omni-inter- triangularly tangent, closest-packed, unit-radius, spherically conformed, energy-event packages; while the vector equilibrium is both radially and omnicircumferentially, omnitriangularly closest packed, i.e., in maximum, intertangential, mass-interattractiveness nucleated concentration.

1052.44 Reminiscent of electron proclivities, the icosahedron displays the same surface number of spherically conformed, energy-event packages and its only-one-wavelength-deep, single, outer sphere layer array is omnitriangulated, while the vector equilibrium’s surface is arrayed two-fifths in triangulation and three-fifths in open, unstable, square tangency. As spherical agglomerates decrease in radius as, for instance, do the vector equilibria’s contract to the icosahedral phase their sphere centers approach one another, and Newton’s mass-interattraction law, which shows a second-power gain as the interproximities are halved, imposes an intercoherence condition whereby as their overall system radius decreases, their circumferential mass-interattrac- tions increase exponentially as r², where r = radius of the system.