1132.10 Great-circle Railroad Tracks of Energy

1132.11 Each of the 25 great circles of any one closest-packed sphere can be used by that special local sphere as an “until-ready,” local shunt-off, holding circuit track for any traveling energy entity. This is permitted by the fact that each and all of the 25 great circles are foldable into local, bow-tie, clover-leaf, figure-eight, “chain-of-sausages,” three-or-four-bladed-propeller- type patterns which, when totally interassembled, also provide full, uninterrupted, 360-degree, around-the-sphere circuitry. The energy entities can travel around locally on any one sphere’s holding tracks in these local 360-degree total shuntings for as long as is “convenient” to the system.

1132.12 The 25 great circles of the vector equilibrium are the only omni-intersystem-connecting “railroad tracks” of energy in the Universe. When an energy entity holding locally on a local sphere gets a green light to get back on the grand-omni-interspheres’ system tracks, it can do so by crossing over one of the 12 inter-atomic-sphere bridges. As we have seen in Sec. 450, three of the vector equilibrium’s four unique sets of great circles, whose respective numbers total 25, disclose different rates of encounter with the 12 tangential “Grand Central Stations” through which the energy-entity travelers can transfer to other spheres of the omni-equiradiused, closest-packed-spherical-dynamics domains of any one elemental atomic class. Arranged in order of the number of encounters with (and entries into) the sphere-to-sphere, tangential grand-central transfer points per each great-circle cycle, they may be accounted as follows:

6 great circles go through 2 points per 360cycle

+:------------------------------------+:----------------------------------------------------------------+
| n ft u n | |
+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| ^{u n h ft} | |
+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| /j h h tt n | 6 |
+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| shunt holding | transfer opportunities |
+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| circuits | > per each spheric moment, of which only 12 can be accommodated |
+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

1132.13 Because only 12 of 16 station transfers can be accommodated, each sphere has inherently eternal retention of four energy entities. Four energy entities comprise the minimum system-defining constellationi.e. the tetrahedronwhich is exactly one energy quantum. Thus we see that the 16 potential encounters of the 25 great-circle sphere may be identified as ¹⁶/4 =4 energy quanta, of which only three may be accommodated at the exits: wherefore a fourth quantum is always retained. No sphere or atom can be exhausted.

1133.00 Information Control System of Universe

1133.01 In the vector equilibrium’s total of 25 great-circle circuitings, we find at any one moment four different sets of great-circle holding patterns and four energy quanta per sphere, but with exit accommodation for only three quanta. With all these beautiful local holding-circuit switches and stop-and-go controls we begin to comprehend conceptually the method by which nature can shunt, valve, hold, and transmit all information in Universe. This is the information-control system of the Universe. This is the way spheres transmit through closest-packing patterns.

1133.02 This is why transistors work; it explains why somebody was suddenly able to discover that a tiny piece of metal embraced an energy-quanta valving system having reliable regularities. Science unthinkingly spoke of this phenomenon as “solid state physics,” partially because individual humans could not see those beautiful little atoms and electrons doing their acts on their railroad tracks and their respective local great-circle energy holding patterns, and partially because science has been flying blind on instruments. For over a century science has been maintaining stubbornly that there was nothing to see by looking out of the windows. They said nature does not use models in the invisible microcosm; she uses only abstract equations. This “nonconceptuality viewpoint” was fortified to the public by use of the term “solid state physics.”

1133.03 In the behaviors of the vector equilibrium’s 25 great circles we have the basis for the design of a nuclear omnidirectional typewriter, a programmable computer smaller than a pinhead, which is capable of storing, retrieving, and printing out all humanly acquirable information. Synergetics mathematics has the ability to convert the spherically arranged information and project it onto flat conceptual-information-printout arrays of negligible distortion. The least-possible-distorted transformational projection is icosahedral treatment employed in the Dymaxion airocean world map system. The simplest frame of reference, however, is that of the spherical tetrahedron, which transforms into the flat, omnitriangulated-grid, strip-wrapped, four-dimensionally-symmetrical tetrahedron. The tetrahedron produces a conveniently linear, four-dimensional roller printout.

1133.04 These transformational projections afford the most economical, least distorted means of translating the symmetrically omnidirectional into a flat symmetrical projection. The prime structural system of Universe, the tetrahedron, unwraps linearly to print out all possible variations of angle and frequency modulation. Here we have a conceptualizing model that can be reliably programmed to conceptualize atomic structurings at humanly discernible magnitudes. This kind of atomic-level behavior is exactly what all the computer model specialists have been missingergo, the magnitude of the chasm between their projective equation strategies and synergetics’ four-dimensional conceptual integrity independent of size and its inherent ability to deal discretely with closest-packed atomic system proclivities and behaviors.