BUCKYVERSE

260.20 Convergent vs Parallel Perception

260.21 All exclusively three-dimensional matrixes, consisting only of parallel lines and perpendicular rectilinear interactionslike parallel railroad tracksinherently fail to accommodate any terminal convergence. Such matrixes fail to accommodate the inherent strategy of range-finding: the fact that the linear-distance relationship between our two human eyesand also those of other optically equipped creatureswas designed to provide the baseline of a triangle whose opposite apex occurs at the position of a sighted object. The convergent apex angle of the object provides the human brain’s computer circuitry with a limited, distance-to-object-magnitude appraising, or range-finding perceptivity, wh ose maximum terrestrial range is the horizon. Beyond the horizon the distances between remote objects are reduced to optically non-tunable angle-size or -frequency discernibility. Ergo, at the maximum tunability of differential-wavelength-perceptivity, our range-finding optical system produces a false image of a seemingly convergent pair of parallel railroad tracks. It is not that the tracks or the tie s are coming together, but that the distance between them is subtunable.

260.211 Our two eyes form the baseline of an isosceles triangle and seek to disc ern the convergent angle at an opposite object apex: for instance, tracks A or B, with the distance between Aand Bconstant. The farther away they are, they become relatively shorter and shorter chords of ever larger circles Aand B, and finally they appear to be congruent. See Fig. 260.211.

260.22 Though the diameter of Betelgeuse in Orion’s Belt is greater than the diameter of the planet Earth’s orbit around the Sun, Betelgeuse appears to Earthians only as a fine point of light. As in the rate of information recall by the mind from brain storage, there is also an inherent lag in the rate human optical equipment can apprehend newly perceived phenomena. The pulsative frequency o f alternating current electric light is 60 cycles per second, which is designed to coincide with the frequency corresponding to humans’ “second look” stroboscopic rate of apprehending. In a like manner the frequency rate of th e cinema’s picture-frame running is synchronized to coincide with the human rate of mental-mouthful digestibility of new information receptivity, which must check the new information with the old to permit recognition or new cognition. The static frames themselves as in benday screen printingare frequency-subdivided into local increments whose wavelength-spacing is infratunable by the human-brain-apprehending set. The human brain apprehends 200 info-bits per inch as omnicontinuous, despite the separate frequency islands of their different color light points, each of which is an island of different electromagnetic frequencies. All of the spots are frequency islands like events and novents (See Sec. 524.01).