265.00 Unity of Triangulation

265.01 Otherness involves some thingness; This brings us to reconsideration of the nature of epistemological evolution and of the gradual transition in degrees of relative adequacy of macroscale of human comprehending and in microscale of definitive exactitude in interpreting what is being humanly experienced. Humans were included in the cosmic system’s design to fulfill critical functions in respect to maintenance of the integrity of eternally regenerative Scenario Universe. To arrive full-blown and functioning in its cosmic role, humanity has been given the capability to inventory its tactical resources progressively and to reorient its functioning from an omni automated behavior to a progressively more conscious and responsible behavioral pattern.

265.02 The epistemological evolution of individual humans has also included progressive appraisal of the relative significance of the separate scenarios of experience as periodically elucidated by the synergetically accruing concepts. Thus the sum of all human experiences seems periodically to explain how humans fit into the cosmic scheme, as that cosmic scheme itself evolves as emergingly and sum-totally appraised and disclosed by scholarstogether with those cosmologists’ controversial explanatory theories.

265.03 At one early historical moment in that epistemological evolution humans evolved the mathematical concept of dimensionless points, lines, and planes. Their dimensionless lines and planes were aggregates of the dimensionless points, yet these self-contradictory concepts have persisted in the children’s school curricula of today, despite the fact that they were adopted long before humans had even dreamed of optical magnifying lenses, let alone electron microscopes. The philosophy that adopted such nonoperational educational devices was predicated they said upon “purely imaginary phenomena,” and since the image-ination of the brain is entirely furnished with special case experiences of system conceptuality (see Secs. 504.04 and 1056.15), it is appropriate in this moment of instrumentally informed experience to reformulate our experience-substantiated philosophy.

265.04 Considerability (con-sidus The interrelationship of a plurality of stars) is experientially furnished and is inherently systemic. The axial spinnability of all systems provides observational orientation in azimuth around the head-to-heel axis, statable in measurable fractions of circular unity. In the special case of humans as the observing system we have the head-to-heel axis of observational reference. We have therefore the hu man observer’s system’s inherent “additive twoness” provided by the system’s two poles of such axial spin. In humans’ organic systems we have also the multiplicative twoness of insideness-outsidenessi.e., the system’s convex-concave congruity.

265.05 The observed otherness can b e an organically integral part of the individual observer, for the individual human organism isat simplest a system comprised of a myriad of systems, which in turn are comprised of myriads of subsystems of subsystems of subsystemsto the limit of present microexploration capability. And the individual human organism will always consist of systems and never of nonsystems, for less-than-system systems are inherently nondiscoverable. (See Sec. 400.011.)

265.06 Observing individuals can be visually or tactilely aware of another (complex or subsystem) part of their own systemic organism for example, the child’s hand tactilely discovering its own foot’s temperature, texture, olfactoral, taste, relative size, and conformation. This self-discovery, otherness-aroused awareness of the individual includes the child’s cerebral-cortex feeling that it s stomach is hungry, whereby the brain instructs the child’s fourfold aural-communication-system-defining mouth, throat, tongue, and lungs to start pumping in and out of the smellable, nonorganically integral, otherness atmosphere to produce “crying” for contact with an external udder of the nonintegral othernessthe m-m-motherness from which to suck (pump) out her nonintegral otherness milk produced by her digested consumption of a plurality of nonintegral othernesses. This is an objective-subjective awareness of the complex individual’s integral otherness parts.

265.07 Here is the complex integral otherness with which philosophers have for so long failed to confront themselves in their epistemological considerations. They have erroneously assumed that original, or initial, cognizable otherness exists exclusively in a separate external entity other than that of the organism of the observer. The individual is inherently complex, having four different sensing systems: the same four separate and differentially unique apprehending advantages tha t are always acquired to define a tetrahedron as the minimum system in Universe.

265.08 As with the “out” of in-out-and-around directions, the ultratunable is ultra to both external and internal experiences of human record. The ultratunable nothingness persists where the electromagnetic wavelengths involved a re greater than the span of all humanly remembered experiences; wherefore the last time such a phenomenon occurred was prior to human experience recording, the next time its wave is to peak is unpredictable, be cause it always takes a minimum of two experiences to define a wavelength, but it always takes a minimum of three identical-magnitude events (waves) and their identical-magnitude wave intervals to definitively arouse humans’ awareness that they are experiencing an unfamiliar wave-frequency phenomenonergo, to trigger humans’ re-cognition capability thus to become aware of the same phenomenon being repeated for a third time (tres-pass) with the same interval of tim e between them occurring for the second time. (See Sec. 526.23.)

265.09 But it takes a fourth equifrequenced and equiwavelengthed experience in the angular direction deviations of then ever-occurring straightlinedness of wavilinear Scenario Universe to produce the altitude from which sensing advantage the intertriangulatability of the first three experiences may be apprehendedwhich triangular pattern integrity becomes realized by mind as forming the base, the three separate directions toward which three previous event corners provide altogether the six unique lines of interrelationship direction of the four experience events that constitute a system, of whose presence the observer-sensor is now initially aware. Conceptuality is tetrahedral.

265.10 The operational self-discovery of any given conceptually periodic frequency is predicated upon a minimum experience quota of four successively experienced, similar events. This is because the three original time intervals between four angularly finite event s constitute the minimum number of experience intervals necessary to establish the human mind’s awareness that it is experiencing an identical interval repetition between what seem to be similar events. The first interval between the first two similar experiences was entirely unanticipated andas of the moment of first recurrenceseemed to be only an inconsequential happen stance. But the third repeat of a similar, angularly conformed, finite experience that is recurring at a second and similar interval of elapsed time to that intervening between the first and second experiences couldand sometimes does arouse an intuitive sense of there being a possible time-lapse-identifying significance present in the second successively similar lapse of time between the now-threefold similarity of angularly conformed experiences.

265.11 On the occasion of the third similar experience intuition can and sometimes doesreduce a hypothetical assumption and prediction by the experiencing individual of the possibility or probability of the future recurrence of a fourth such similar experience, which predicative hypothesis can only be confirmed by the actual fourth-time experiencing of the similar, angularly conformed, finite event recurring on schedule after the third experiencing of the same interval of elapsed time. If this fourth finite event does occur as hypothetically predicted after the third interval of the same time lapse, it provides experimental evidence of the existence of a consistent frequency and interval system of event recurrences. This may be recorded by humans a s scientifically reliable ergo, as operationally usable data.

265.12 A frequency of four events provides the three intervals that also form the base triangle of the tetrahedron apexed by the initially unpaired, angularly finite event. The insideness and outsideness of this primitively evolved tetrahedron constitute the minimum macrocosm-microcosmdifferentiating system of the Universe. This tetrahedron has six angularly directional interrelationship lines interconnecting its four finite events. (See “Observer as Tetrasystem,” Sec. 267.)

265.13 The chief characteristic of frequencyis the accommodation of special case systems. Frequency identification begins only upon the recurrence of a directionally continuous fourth similar event along any one line of vertexial interrelationships of a systemergo, with a minim um of thr ee similar time intervals. An angle, as we learn at Sec. 515.10, is inherently a subfrequency event. Four nonsimultaneous, unique, angular event experiences occurring successively as a trajectory trending in the same direction constitute the minimum constituents for the time-size-measurable special casei. e., temporal caseidentifications.