535.00 Halo Concept

535.01 The phenomenon “infinity” of the calculus is inherently finite (see Sec. 224.11 ). Universe is nonsimultaneous but finite, because all experiences begin and end. and being terminal, are finite; ergo, Universe as the sum of finites is finite.

535.02 Nonsimultaneous Universe is finite but conceptually undefinable; local systems are definable. We discover that Universe is finite and a local system is definite; every definite local system has inherent, always and only co-occurring twoness of polar axis spinnability and twoness of concave-convex complementary disparity of energy interaction behavior,[^18] plus two invisible tetrahedra (or two unities), altogether adding together as equal finitely fourfold symmetry Universe. The difference between Universe and any local system is always two invisible tetrahedra. Every local system may be subdivided into whole tetrahedra.

535.03 Finite minus de-finite means four tetrahedra minus two tetrahedra. Finite Universe equals eight cyclic unities. Every tetrahedron equals two, having inside-outingness oscillatory transformability unavailable to any structural system other than the tetrahedron.

535.04 Halo conceptioning discloses the minute yet finitely discrete inaccuracy of the fundamental assumption upon which calculus was built; to wit, that for an infinitesimal moment a line is congruent with the circle to which it is tangent and that a plane is congruent with the sphere to which it is tangent. Calculus had assumed 360 degrees around every point on a sphere. The sum of a sphere’s angles was said to be infinite. The halo concept and its angularly generated topology proves that there are always 720 degrees, or two times unity of 360 degrees, less than the calculus’ assumption of 360 degrees times every point in every “spherical” system. This 720 degrees equals the sum of the angles of a tetrahedron. We can state that the number of vertexes of any system (including a “sphere,” which must, geodesically, in universal-energy conservation, be a polyhedron of n vertexes) minus two times 360 degrees equals the sum of the angles around all the vertexes of the system. Two times 360 degrees, which was the amount subtracted, equals 720 degrees, which is the angular description of the tetrahedron. We have to take angular “tucks” in the nonconceptual finity (the calculus infinity). The “tucks” add up to 720 degrees, i.e., one tetrahedron. The difference between conceptual de-finity and nonconceptual finity is one nonconceptual, finite tetrahedron.

535.05 In the general theory of variables, it has been recognized that the set of all the variables may be divided into two classes: (1) the class of all the inclusive variables within a given system, the interior relevants, and (2) the class of all those operative exclusive of the system, the exterior relevants. It has been further recognized that the variables outside the system may affect the system from outside. In varying degrees, specific levels of subclasses of these “background” or outside variables are identified as parameters. But the “background” concept is fallaciously inadequate; dealing with insideness and outsideness for “background” is limited to the two-dimensional or flatprojection concept, which inherently lacks insidenessergo, cannot also have outsideness, which always and only coexists with insideness. Ergo, all two- dimensional copings with systems are inherently inadequate and prophetically vitiated.

535.06 Our omnioriented halo concept converts the parameter consideration to symmetrically conceptual four-dimensionality and discloses a set of parameters inside as well as outside the zone of lucidly considered system stars. And the parameters are, at minimum, fourfold:

1. the convex twilight zone of inward relevancy;

2. the concave twilight zone of outward relevancy;

3. the stark, nonconceptual irrelevancy inward; and

4. the stark, nonconceptual irrelevancy outward.

Parameter 1 is a visible tetrahedron. Parameter 2 is a visible tetrahedron. Parameter 3 is an invisible tetrahedron. Parameter 4 is an invisible tetrahedron.

535.07 The considered relevancy within the zone of lucidity consists of one tetrahedron or more. For each “considered tetrahedron,” there are three complementary always and only co-occurring parametric tetrahedra. We discover that our omnihalo epistemological accounting consists entirely of rational tetrahedral quantation.

535.08 By the omnidirection, star-studded halo reasoning, the development of a conceptual tetrahedron automatically changes a negative yet invisible tetrahedron into the nonsimultaneous, nonconceptual, finite Universe, comprehensive to the local de-finite conceptual system.

535.09 The halo concept is that of an omnidirectional, complex, high- frequency, Doppler-effected, hypothetical zone experience in an omnidirectional, universal maelstrom of nonsimultaneous near and far explosions and their interaccelerating and refractive wave-frequency patternings and complex, precessionally-induced, local orbitings. The omni-interactions impinge on your nervous system in all manner of frequencies, some so “high” as to appear as “solid” things, some so slow as seeming to be “absolute voids.”