Bertrand Russell & Buckminster Fuller on Why We Should Work Less, and Live & Learn More | Open Culture
Why must we all work long hours to earn the right to live? Why must only the wealthy have access to leisure, aesthetic pleasure, self-actualization...? Everyone seems to have an answer, according to their political or theological bent. Open Culture, openculture.com
Page content (https://www.openculture.com/2015/10/bertrand-russell-buckminster-fuller-on-why-we-should-spend-less-time-working.html)
Online Courses Audio Books Movies Podcasts K-12 eBooks Languages Donate Bertrand Russell & Buckminster Fuller on Why We Should Work Less, and Live and Learn More in Economics , Life | January 11th, 2024 3 Comments Why must we all work long hours to earn the right to live? Why must only the wealthy have access to leisure, aesthetic pleasure, self-actualization…? Everyone seems to have an answer, according to their political or theological bent. One economic bogeyman, so-called “trickle-down” economics , or “Reaganomics,” actually predates our 40th president by a few hundred years at least. The notion that we must better ourselves—or simply survive—by toiling to increase the wealth and property of already wealthy men was perhaps first comprehensively articulated in the 18th-century doctrine of “improvement.” In order to justify privatizing common land and forcing the peasantry into jobbing for them, English landlords attempted to show in treatise after treatise that 1) the peasants were lazy, immoral, and unproductive, and 2) they were better off working for others. As a corollary, most argued that landowners should be given the utmost social and political privilege so that their largesse could benefit everyone. This scheme necessitated a complete redefinition of what it meant to work. In his study, The English Village Community and the Enclosure Movements , historian W.E. Tate quotes from several of the “improvement” treatises, many written by Puritans who argued that “the poor are of two classes, the industrious poor who are content to work for their betters, and the idle poor who prefer to work for themselves.” Tate’s summation perfectly articulates the early modern redefinition of “work” as the creation of profit for owners. Such work is virtuous, “industrious,” and leads to contentment. Other kinds of work, leisurely, domestic, pleasurable, subsistence, or otherwise, qualifies—in an Orwellian turn of phrase—as “idleness.” (We hear echoes of this rhetoric in the language of “deserving” and “undeserving” poor.) It was this language, and its legal and social repercussions, that Max Weber later documented in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism , Karl Marx reacted to in Das Capital , and feminists have shown to be a consolidation of patriarchal power and further exclusion of women from economic participation. Along with Marx, various others have raised significant objections to Protestant, capitalist definitions of work, including Thomas Paine , the Fabians , agrarians, and anarchists. In the twentieth century, we can add two significant names to an already distinguished list of dissenters: Buckminster Fuller and Bertrand Russell . Both challenged the notion that we must have wage-earning jobs in order to live, and that we are not entitled to indulge our passions and interests unless we do so for monetary profit or have independent wealth. In a New York Times column on Russell’s 1932 essay “ In Praise of Idleness ,” Gary Gutting writes, “For most of us, a paying job is still utterly essential — as masses of unemployed people know all too well. But in our economic system, most of us inevitably see our work as a means to something else: it makes a living, but it doesn’t make a life.” In far too many cases in fact, the work we must do to survive robs us of the ability to live by ruining our health, consuming all our precious time, and degrading our environment. In his essay, Russell argued that “there is far too much work done in the world, that immense harm is caused by the belief that work is virtuous, and that what needs to be preached in modern industrial countries is quite different from what has always been preached.” His “arguments for laziness,” as he called them, begin with definitions of what we mean by “work,” which might be characterized as the difference between labor and management: What is work? Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth’s surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and highly paid. Russell further divides the second category into “those who give orders” and “those who give advice as to what orders should be given.” This latter kind of work, he says, “is called politics,” and requires no real “knowledge of the subjects as to which advice is given,” but only the ability to manipulate: “the art of persuasive speaking and writing, i.e. of advertising.” Russell then discusses a “third class of men” at the top, “more respected than either of the classes of the workers”—the landowners, who “are able to make others pay for the privilege of being allowed to exist and to work.” The idleness of landowners, he writes, “is only rendered possible by the industry of others. Indeed their desire for comfortable idleness is historically the source of the whole gospel of work. The last thing they have ever wished is that others should follow their example.” The “gospel of work” Russell outlines is, he writes, “the morality of the Slave State,” and the kinds of murderous toil that developed under its rule—actual chattel slavery, fifteen hour workdays in abominable conditions, child labor—has been “disastrous.” Work looks very different today than it did even in Russell’s time, but even in modernity, when labor movements have managed to gather some increasingly precarious amount of social security and leisure time for working people, the amount of work forced upon the majority of us is unnecessary for human thriving and in fact counter to it—the result of a still-successful capitalist propaganda campaign: if we aren’t laboring for wages to increase the profits of others, the logic still dictates, we will fall to sloth and vice and fail to earn our keep. “Satan finds some mischief for idle hands to do,” goes the Protestant proverb Russell quotes at the beginning of his essay. On the contrary, he concludes, …in a world where no one is compelled to work more than four hours a day, every person possessed of scientific curiosity will be able to indulge it, and every painter will be able to paint without starving, however excellent his pictures may be. Young writers will not be obliged to draw attention to themselves by sensational pot-boilers, with a view to acquiring the economic independence for monumental works, for which, when the time at last comes, they will have lost the taste and capacity. The less we are forced to labor, the more we can do good work in our idleness, and we can all labor less, Russell argues, because “modern methods of production have given us the possibility of ease and security for all” instead of “overwork for some and starvation for others.” A few decades later, visionary architect, inventor, and theorist Buckminster Fuller would make exactly the same argument, in similar terms, against the “specious notion that everybody has to earn a living.” Fuller articulated his ideas on work and non-work throughout his long career. He put them most succinctly in a 1970 New York magazine “Environmental Teach-In” : It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest…. We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everybody has to be employed at some kind of drudgery because, according to Malthusian-Darwinian theory, he must justify his right to exist. Many people are paid very little to do backbreaking labor; many others paid quite a lot to do very little. The creation of surplus jobs leads to redundancy, inefficiency, and the bureaucratic waste we hear so many politicians rail against: “we have inspectors and people making instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors”—all to satisfy a dubious moral imperative and to make a small number of rich people even richer. What should we do instead? We should continue our education, and do what we please, Fuller argues: “The true business of people should be to go back to school and think about whatever it was they were thinking about before somebody came along and told them they had to earn a living.” We should all, in other words, work for ourselves, performing the kind of labor we deem necessary for our quality of life and our social arrangements, rather than the kinds of labor dictated to us by governments, landowners, and corporate executives. And we can all do so, Fuller thought, and all flourish similarly. Fuller called the technological and evolutionary advancement that enables us to do more with less “euphemeralization.” In Critical Path , a visionary work on human development, he claimed “It is now possible to give every man, woman and child on Earth a standard of living comparable to that of a modern-day billionaire.” Sound utopian? Perhaps. But Fuller’s far-reaching path out of reliance on fossil fuels and into a sustainable future has never been tried, for some depressingly obvious reasons and some less obvious. Neither Russell nor Fuller argued for the abolition—or inevitable self-destruction—of capitalism and the rise of a workers’ paradise. (Russell gave up his early enthusiasm for communism.) Neither does Gary Gutting, a philosophy professor at the University of Notre Dame, who in his New York Times commentary on Russell asserts that “Capitalism, with its devotion to profit, is not in itself evil.” Most Marxists on the other hand would argue that devotion to profit can never be benign. But there are many middle ways between state communism and our current religious devotion to supply-side capitalism, such as robust democratic socialism or a basic income guarantee. In any case, what most dissenters against modern notions of work share in common is the conviction that education should produce critical thinkers and self-directed individuals, and not, as Gutting puts it, “be primarily for training workers or consumers”—and that doing work we love for the sake of our own personal fulfillment should not be the exclusive preserve of a propertied leisure class. Note: An earlier version of this post appeared on our site in 2015. Related Content: Charles Bukowski Rails Against 9‑to‑5 Jobs in a Brutally Honest Letter (1986) Brian Eno’s Advice for Those Who Want to Do Their Best Creative Work: Don’t Get a Job Hear Alan Watts’s 1960s Prediction That Automation Will Necessitate a Universal Basic Income Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC. Follow him at @jdmagness by OC | Permalink | Comments (3) | Support Open Culture We’re hoping to rely on our loyal readers rather than erratic ads. To support Open Culture’s educational mission, please consider making a donation . We accept PayPal, Venmo (@openculture), Patreon and Crypto! Please find all options here . We thank you! Comments (3) You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. h. e. says: January 11, 2024 at 12:57 pm This should be required reading — social economics 101. Thanks for publishing this excellent article. Reply John Kazzer says: January 12, 2024 at 2:02 am Great article. Am interested in how the concept holds-up in context of international competition between countries. How would you portray the role of EU or USA when going down this route in a world with Russia, China and India staying as they are? Reply Jeff Smith says: April 2, 2026 at 7:07 pm Hi, Editor; Celebrate America’s 250th on stage. Produce a play about Tom Paine, the most influential Founding Father. Choose the one-man show, “The Most Famous Forgotten Man”. Or, the two-person show, “Saint Peter Queries Thomas Paine: revolutionary stopped for questioning at the Pearly Gates”. Both dramadies relate the life of this amazing humanitarian. His Common Sense and other books inspired three nations to seek justice. Napoleon, Jefferson, Franklin, and other heroes befriended him. Never quite fulfilled, however, were his romances. See scenes from the production of an earlier version—Tom Paine’s Bones—https://youtu.be/FUyuzxOooBA. To read either script, contact Jeffery J. Smith, author and linguist, jj * @ ******* cs.org ; 503/568‑5889 Jeffery J. Smith, 503/568‑5889 Co-founder: DocTours; and Member: Mensa and Society for Ecological Economics Reply Leave a Reply Name (required) Email (required) Message Click here to cancel reply. Essentials 1,700 Free Online Courses 100+ Online Degree & Mini-Degree Programs 1,150 Free Movies 1,000 Free Audio Books 150+ Best Podcasts 800 Free eBooks 200 Free Textbooks 300 Free Language Lessons Support Us We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you! Free Courses Art & Art History Astronomy Biology Business Chemistry Classics/Ancient World Computer Science Data Science Economics Engineering Environment History Literature Math Philosophy Physics Political Science Psychology Religion Writing & Journalism All 1700 Free Courses Free Movies 1150 Free Movies Online Free Film Noir Silent Films Documentaries Martial Arts/Kung Fu Animations Free Hitchcock Films Free Charlie Chaplin Free John Wayne Movies Free Tarkovsky Films Free Dziga Vertov Free Oscar Winners Free Language Lessons Arabic Chinese English French German Italian Russian Spanish All Languages Free eBooks 700 Free eBooks Free Philosophy eBooks The Harvard Classics Philip K. Dick Stories Neil Gaiman Stories David Foster Wallace Stories & Essays Hemingway Stories Great Gatsby & Other Fitzgerald Novels HP Lovecraft Edgar Allan Poe Free Alice Munro Stories Jennifer Egan Stories George Saunders Stories Hunter S. Thompson Essays Joan Didion Essays Gabriel Garcia Marquez Stories David Sedaris Stories Stephen King Chomsky Golden Age Comics Free Books by UC Press Life Changing Books Free Audio Books 700 Free Audio Books Free Audio Books: Fiction Free Audio Books: Poetry Free Audio Books: Non-Fiction Free Textbooks 200 Free Textbooks Free Physics Textbooks Free Computer Science Textbooks Free Math Textbooks K-12 Resources Free Books Free Video Lessons Web Resources by Subject Free Language Lessons Quality YouTube Channels Teacher Resources Test Prep All Free Kids Resources Free Art & Images All Art Images & Books The Met The Getty The Rijksmuseum Smithsonian The Guggenheim The Tate The National Gallery The Whitney LA County Museum Stanford University British Library Google Art Project French Revolution Getty Images Guggenheim Art Books Met Art Books Getty Art Books New York Public Library Maps Museum of New Zealand Street Art Smarthistory Rembrandt Van Gogh Coloring Books Free Music All Bach Organ Works All of Bach 80,000 Classical Music Scores Free Classical Music Live Classical Music 9,000 Grateful Dead Concerts Alan Lomax Blues & Folk Archive Writing Tips Hemingway Fitzgerald Stephen King Ray Bradbury William Zinsser Kurt Vonnegut Toni Morrison Edgar Allan Poe Margaret Atwood David Ogilvy Steinbeck Billy Wilder Archive All posts by date Personal Finance Open Personal Finance Categories Amazon Kindle Animation Apple Archaeology Architecture Archives Art Artificial Intelligence Astronomy Audio Books Biology Books Business Chemistry Coloring Books Comedy Comics/Cartoons Computer Science Creativity Current Affairs Dance Data Deals Design e-books Economics Education English Language Entrepreneurship Environment Fashion Film Finance Food & Drink Games Gender Google Graduation Speech Harvard Health History How to Learn for Free Internet Archive iPad iPhone Jazz K-12 Language Language Lessons Law Letters Libraries Life Literature Magazines Maps Math Media MIT MOOCs Most Popular Museums Music Nature Neuroscience Online Courses Opera Philosophy Photography Physics Podcasts Poetry Politics Pretty Much Pop Productivity Psychology Radio Random Religion Sci Fi Science Software Sports Stanford Technology TED Talks Television Theatre Travel Twitter UC Berkeley Uncategorized Video - Arts & Culture Video - Politics/Society Video - Science Video Games Web/Tech Wikipedia Writing Yale YouTube Great Lectures Michel Foucault Sun Ra at UC Berkeley Richard Feynman Joseph Campbell Carl Sagan Margaret Atwood Jorge Luis Borges Leonard Bernstein Richard Dawkins Buckminster Fuller Walter Kaufmann on Existentialism Jacques Lacan Roland Barthes Nobel Lectures by Writers Toni Morrison Bertrand Russell Oxford Philosophy Lectures About Us Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between. Advertise With Us Great Recordings T.S. Eliot Reads Waste Land Sylvia Plath - Ariel Joyce Reads Ulysses Joyce - Finnegans Wake Patti Smith Reads Virginia Woolf Albert Einstein Charles Bukowski Bill Murray Hemingway Fitzgerald Reads Shakespeare William Faulkner Flannery O'Connor Tolkien - The Hobbit Allen Ginsberg - Howl W.B Yeats Ezra Pound Dylan Thomas Anne Sexton John Cheever David Foster Wallace Book Lists By Neil deGrasse Tyson Ernest Hemingway F. Scott Fitzgerald Allen Ginsberg Patti Smith Brian Eno Henry Miller Christopher Hitchens Joseph Brodsky W.H. Auden Donald Barthelme Carl Sagan David Bowie Samuel Beckett Art Garfunkel Marilyn Monroe Jorge Luis Borges Picks by Female Creatives Syllabi WH Auden David Foster Wallace Donald Barthelme Allen Ginsberg Zadie Smith & Gary Shteyngart Spike Lee Lynda Barry Junot Diaz Favorite Movies Kubrick Kurosawa's 100 Tarantino Scorsese Tarkovsky David Lynch Werner Herzog Woody Allen Wes Anderson Luis Buñuel Roger Ebert Susan Sontag Scorsese Foreign Films Philosophy Films Archives June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 Aug